Search for: "Hill v. United States"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 2,548
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 7:12 pm
“EELV continues to be the most successful DOD acquisition program of the past few decades,” the release stated. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 7:06 am
” Unites States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:24 am
In a March 31 opinion in Hill v. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 7:35 am
This case is from the United States District Court, Northern District, Fort Worth Division. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:15 am
Hearings at Guantanamo Bay on United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:52 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:58 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:51 am
Carr and Reynolds v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 10:49 am
” But, it added: “To be clear, the United States continues to believe that this case raises an issue of great public importance. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:32 pm
As we have seen over the last year, the bulk collection of citizens’ phone records has driven a national debate about the proper role of surveillance in the United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:28 am
Remember the DC Circuit opinion in Aamer v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 12:30 pm
At the height of our involvement in Vietnam, the United States Supreme Court held that high school students had a First Amendment right to protest the war by wearing black armbands in school. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 2:24 pm
In addition, even if New York law allows for jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction in the case must "comport with the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution" – i.e., there must be minimum contacts with the forum jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm
” Records on file with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) show that on August 5, 2013, Tesla Motors, Inc. filed a trademark application for “Model E,” in several classes of goods, including that for “Automobiles and structural parts therefor. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
The defendants argued that the trial judge had taken a holistic approach to assessment of infringement and that the Court should instead apply an approach similar to the “abstraction-filtration-comparison” approach used to assess substantiality in the context of computer software infringement in the United States per Computer Associates International, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
It is the defendant’s contention that judgment was obtained in violation of a right of his right under the constitution of this state or of the United States pursuant to C.P.L. 440.10(1)(h). [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
In Ross v. [read post]
