Search for: "His Law v. USA" Results 1461 - 1480 of 3,297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2009, 6:20 pm
The Federal Circuit ruled that because Larson assigned his rights in the invention he did not have standing to sue to correct inventorship under § 256 Related posts:E.D. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Oracle USA Inc., about the scope of the costs awarded to a prevailing party in a copyright case. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
His conclusion on these domestic authorities were summed up as follows: 48. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
This week saw the ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Experience Hendrix LLC v Purple Haze Records Ltd and others [2007] EWCA Civ 501, a decision of Lords Justices Keene, Jacob and Toulson on Thursday 24 May 2007.Musical megastar Jimi Hendrix (left), a US citizen, gave performances between 1967 and his death in 1970 in (among other places) the UK, Sweden and the USA. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:17 am by John J. Sullivan
Teva Pharmas., USA, Inc., 2012 WL 5364392 (M.D. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:09 am by James Romoser
In an essay for The Regulatory Review’s annual Supreme Court series, Charlton Copeland argues that Justice Neil Gorsuch’s battle against the Chevron doctrine played a role in his decision in Bostock v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 1:50 pm by Howard Knopf
Fortunately, the Supreme Court of Canada completely ignored this submission.However, that said, there is some arguably rogue and wrong but often cited appellate law in the USA (Bridgeport v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am by Adam Chandler
Eugene Volokh continues his “short essay” on Snyder v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:35 am by Kiran Bhat
Robert Pear reports in the New York Times on the Obama administration’s unexpected support for drug maker Astra Zeneca in Astra USA, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:16 pm by Florian Mueller
Undoubtedly, what was already warranted in the Garretson mop-head case is hugely more relevant in the smartphone era.There's some indication that the Supreme Court may have felt last year that the question of apportionment at least potentially warranted another look: on April 4, 2018, the Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to express the views of the federal government on the cert petition in EVE-USA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Richard Wolf for USA Today, and Tony Mauro at The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required). [read post]