Search for: "Husband v. Wife"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 6,700
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2018, 4:40 pm
In a judgment delivered on 22 February 2018 in the case of Ali v Channel 5 Broadcast ([2018] EWHC 298 (Ch)) Arnold J ordered Channel 5 to pay £20,000 in damages for misuse of private information to a couple, Shakir Ali and Shahida Aslam, who had fallen into rent arears. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:50 pm
Ali and Aslam v Channel 5 Broadcast Ltd (2018) EWHC 298 (Ch) I won’t go into detail – do read the judgment for the oddest mashup of housing law, media law and privacy law we have encountered (so far) – but suffice it to say that a husband and wife evicted by High Court Sheriffs and filmed as this happened (and without any consent) by a production company for Channel 5’s morally abysmal ‘Can’t Pay, We’ll Take It Away’, won a… [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 9:30 am
In a case out of Oakland County, Elkins v Benner, Nos 331701, 332664, 333114, the plaintiff Elkins argued the alter-ego rule to make the defendant Nancy Benner, spouse, responsible for her ex-husband/disbarred attorneys’ failure to pay the agreed upon referral fee. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 6:37 pm
Cameron the wife sued her former husband for fraudulent inducement after an annulment. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 5:53 pm
An example of this truism is the recent British Columbia Supreme Court case of T.N. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
In V.L. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 10:24 am
Thorpe, Reinbold, Trustee, v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 10:24 am
Thorpe, Reinbold, Trustee, v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 10:24 am
Thorpe, Reinbold, Trustee, v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
As for Jacobsen’s representation of her at the time the prenuptial agreement was executed, she admitted that Jacobsen was known to her by virtue of his prior representation of her regarding the settlement of her first husband’s estate. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 12:40 pm
In that case, the former wife sought permission to obtain at her expense a life insurance policy on her ex-husband’s life and require his cooperation regarding same. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 1:14 pm
… That seems clear enough, yet today, there was a reported (precedential) decision in Curran v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 5:42 am
On appeal in Mecca v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:17 am
Fitzgerald v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:17 am
Fitzgerald v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
In Ben-Hiam v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 1:35 am
Yes, the court ruled in Shaver v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 1:35 am
Yes, the court ruled in Shaver v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 3:31 am
Carr v. [read post]
