Search for: "IN RE VIOLATION OF RULE 50"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 2,321
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2013, 7:49 pm
If it goes to moderation because, for example, you’re new here, the time stamp on your comment is what counts. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Be sure and read the fine print for more rules because, as you know, I’m a lawyer and I like rules: Don’t panic if your comment doesn’t show immediately. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:19 pm
If it goes to moderation because, for example, you’re new here, the time stamp on your comment is what counts. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
BK 19) dated October 9, 2012, Plaintiff-Appellee filed with the Regional Court a second contempt motion in accordance with § 890 ZPO (German Code of Civil Procedure) alleging violation of the injunction ordered under item I.1b of the Regional Court's ruling. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 11:06 am
Drivers who qualify can have their surcharges reduced by 50% and pay the amount in a lump sum or over a six month stretch. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:26 am
Disability Discrimination — from WinWinHR Paula Deen Ruling Reminds Us: Title VII Protects White Employees Who Are Discriminated Against for Their Association with Black Employees — from Suits by Suits Clearing up Sexual Harassment — from Mike Haberman’s Omega HR Solutions Another harassment myth, debunked: “If we don’t have a policy, we can’t get in trouble for violating it” —… [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:26 am
Disability Discrimination — from WinWinHR Paula Deen Ruling Reminds Us: Title VII Protects White Employees Who Are Discriminated Against for Their Association with Black Employees — from Suits by Suits Clearing up Sexual Harassment — from Mike Haberman’s Omega HR Solutions Another harassment myth, debunked: “If we don’t have a policy, we can’t get in trouble for violating it” —… [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 6:52 pm
Employer and union group health plan sponsors and insurers of group and individual health plans (Health Plans) agonizing over 2014 plan design decisions are running out of time. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:51 am
(The discussion is around pages 848-50.) [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:48 am
The ACLU will continue to work with Congress to stop the government's spying on innocent people as well as force disclosure about how these programs are used and the secret court rulings that support them. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
Encryption – when and how communications and information can be encoded and decoded so that only the people you want to read the information can have access to it — and wiretapping – that is, whether and under what rules someone can intercept messages in transit and divert or copy them to their own purposes – are just two sides of the same coin. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:05 am
AP reports that a Wisconsin federal court on Monday ruled that $50 million in a cemetery perpetual care trust fund is unavailable to creditors, including abuse victims, in the bankruptcy reorganization of the Milwaukee Catholic Archdiocese. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
We’re not bigots. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:18 pm
(Tang Hui, from Zhao Yinang, In China, Court Ruling Re-Ignites Debate Over Labor Camps, China Daily July 18, 2013). [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:25 pm
See In re: Con-way Freight, Inc., No. 13-71160 (9th Cir. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
: Aereo’s business model of re-transmitting TV broadcasts without a lice… http://t.co/DzKU7TYAa6 -> Link to 7th Circuit copyright decision in Hobbs v Elton John http://t.co/fjITYsePjT -> Prince copyright infringement case rolls on http://t.co/6AabYlLfog -> Australia data breach law a jobs killer? [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 6:48 am
In May 2013 the European Commission issued a Statement of Objections (SO), a preliminary antitrust ruling finding the wholly-owned Google subsidiary guilty of antitrust violations by coercing Apple, at the threat of injunctive relief, into a deal on un-FRAND-ly terms including that Apple had to give up key defenses (non-infringement, invalidity, patent exhaustion). [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
But, the new 12-month rule (rather than the old nine-month rule) applies to these credits also. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:54 pm
In full flower, I replicate it below: [Start of Export Restriction Notice] Export Restriction Notice—The use, disposition, export, and re-export of this property are subject to export control laws, regulations and directives, in effect on the date of contract award and as amended subsequently, that include but are not limited to: the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.); the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C.… [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 11:42 am
This exception is very specific to those roles and apply very different rules. [read post]
