Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD" Results 1461 - 1480 of 2,182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2012, 11:52 am by Steve
One of my interests of late has been child support enforcement. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:07 am
Lubanga told the judges that he acted in the interests of peace, not power or money. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm by Veronika Gaertner
 Kilian Bälz: “Zinsverbote und Zinsbeschränkungen im internationalen Privatrecht” – the English abstract reads as follows: This article challenges the widely held opinion that provisions prohibiting and restricting interest are mandatory provisions in the sense of Art. 9 Rome I Regulation. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:51 am by SHG
Calderon-Villaneuva, 1:12-cr-235, Order Denying Unopposed Motion to Enter into Plea Agreement Containing an Appeal Waiver (doc. 14) (D. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:43 am by Keith Rizzardi
Table 5: Statute under Which Case Was Brought, Amount Paid, and Number of Payments Paid by Treasury from the Judgment Fund on Behalf of Interior, March 2001 through September 2010 Statute under which case was brought a Attorney fees and costs # of payments Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1540 $21,298,971 b 238 Civil Rights Act Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16 1,243,194 38 Tucker Act (inverse condemnation & other claims), 28 U.S.C.… [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:39 pm by Anthony Wright
 The best interests of the child would be served by the termination of parental rights; and     2. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
  Specifically, according to Paragraph 3 of the 2009 Practice Direction concerning the Estates List, the following matters are heard:  (a) All matters arising under Rules 74 and 75 of the Rules of Civil Procedure; (b) Applications under Rule 14.05 regarding estates, wills and trusts, including applications for advice under section 60 of the Trustee Act; (c) Applications relating to inter vivos trusts, whether under Rule 14.05, the Variation of Trusts Act, or… [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 10:38 am by Juan Antunez
Pennell frames the issue in his write up of the Astrue decision: If D leaves DNA in the freezer and that DNA is used postmortem with the requisite permission to produce a child, it seems relatively clear that D intended that child to be a beneficiary of D's estate. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:30 am
Typically, all orders made in family law cases concerning children are based on the best interest of the child. [read post]