Search for: "In Interest of IV"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 6,750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2012, 9:26 am
(iv) Miller equilibrium: debt vs. equity is simply an election to pay tax at the corporate rate (via equity) or at one’s own rate (via debt)2. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:57 am
The diplomats were there to consider whether their Member nations were interested in offering additional protections for integrated circuit designs similar to the U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Jurisdiction (Part IV) (0) Sovereign Immunity Not Waived for Non-Extreme, Even Highly Unfair Results, Absent Express and Unambiguous Waivers by Statute or Regulation (0) Seventh Circuit Agrees with D.C. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm
This case is interesting because it reverted back to placing emphasis on the rareness factor (see our blog post entitled, TTAB’s Precedential Decision That Further Shifts Surname Case Law). [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:36 pm
Chapter IV focuses on the application of these principles to specific recurring issues and subjects, including market definition, market power, and a number of challenged restraints” (e.g., involving players, teams, equipment, broadcasts). [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 2:42 pm
Another interesting civil procedure opinion from the Ninth Circuit today. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
Leslie, the SJC weighed in on privacy interests for residents of multi-family dwellings. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am
In reversing the Fourth Circuit, the Supreme Court concluded that the following factors compel a broad reading of section 1109(b) standing: (i) the statute’s “capacious” nature; (ii) the illustrative, and not exhaustive, nature of the list of “parties in interest” included in the statute; (iii) the ordinary, dictionary meanings of the terms “party” and “interest”; and (iv) the historical development of U.S. bankruptcy… [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am
In reversing the Fourth Circuit, the Supreme Court concluded that the following factors compel a broad reading of section 1109(b) standing: (i) the statute’s “capacious” nature; (ii) the illustrative, and not exhaustive, nature of the list of “parties in interest” included in the statute; (iii) the ordinary, dictionary meanings of the terms “party” and “interest”; and (iv) the historical development of U.S. bankruptcy… [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am
In reversing the Fourth Circuit, the Supreme Court concluded that the following factors compel a broad reading of section 1109(b) standing: (i) the statute’s “capacious” nature; (ii) the illustrative, and not exhaustive, nature of the list of “parties in interest” included in the statute; (iii) the ordinary, dictionary meanings of the terms “party” and “interest”; and (iv) the historical development of U.S. bankruptcy… [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:46 am
B IV" disclosed in Table 1B on page 31 of D6 corresponded to the feature IV(XCS) specified in granted claim 1, as concluded by the opposition division.Since no technical effect was shown in relation to that distinguishing feature, the problem to be solved was to provide an alternative composition. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:46 am
B IV" disclosed in Table 1B on page 31 of D6 corresponded to the feature IV(XCS) specified in granted claim 1, as concluded by the opposition division.Since no technical effect was shown in relation to that distinguishing feature, the problem to be solved was to provide an alternative composition. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 12:29 pm
§ 1026.19(e)(3)(iv)(D). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:34 am
(Humanist John Dewey)IV. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 9:01 pm
In terms of legal analysis, the book's two most important chapters are Chapters IV and V. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 2:57 pm
Overall, we are interested to hear both recommendations on data elements to retain with a justification for using the data at the national level and recommendations on any data elements to remove because they may be either overly burdensome for title IV-E agencies to report or may not be reliable or necessary at the national level. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
†The Commission also determined in the November 9 notice that the public interest factors do not preclude issuance of the limited exclusion order or the cease and desist order. [read post]
2 May 2008, 11:23 am
[iv] Here is a whole tax law manual for lawyers working with low-income taxpayers. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
Some interesting ways to increase awareness of access to justice issues in Canada on social media could include: If your organization isn’t on social media, get on there! [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
Cir. 2016) is not that the court found IV’s content identification system patents invalid as claiming ineligible subject matter. [read post]
