Search for: "In re April B." Results 1461 - 1480 of 3,287
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
” SEC Rule 240.21F-4(b)(4)(iii)(B) provides for this 120-exception for compliance and audit whistleblowers. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:24 pm
Question (b) was also dealt with quite shortly. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 4:47 pm by jefhenninger
In April 2006, Degironemo, through Individual B, sought to further bolster MidStates’ qualifications by causing four individuals to write reference letters falsely stating that MidStates had previously provided various forklift services to their full satisfaction when, in fact, no such services were ever provided. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 7:13 am by Victoria VanBuren
District Court The plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration based on the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB”) ruling In re D.R. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:47 pm by Jeff Gamso
  And really, I want to know about all of them - the ones who've been killed and the ones who just died and the ones who got off the row because some lame-brain judge chickened out or because our governors haven't got the balls to kill.And of course the ones we're not killing nearly fast enough.Well, the Ohio General Assembly wants to know, too.So there's this law that requires the Attorney General to prepare a report every year.Give us all the dirt, directed the… [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:35 am by Broc Romanek
These provisions gained traction, particularly for IPO companies, ever since Vice Chancellor Laster suggested in a 2010 opinion that they would be enforceable (see In re Revlon S'holders Litig., 990 A.2d 940 (Del. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 12:50 pm by Steve Gottlieb
This commentary was broadcast on WAMC Northeast Report, Tuesday, Nov. 26, 2019 [1] F.R.C.P. 26(c)(1). [2] F.R.C.P. 26(b)(1). [3] F.R.C.P. 37(B)(2)(A). [4] See also “Impeachment for Corruption,” my commentary for April 10, 2018, and “Is America For Sale? [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 6:00 am by Henry Chang
  This means that any L-1, H-1B, H-2B, and J-1 nonimmigrants who are already in the United States should be permitted to remain until their status expires, as long as they do not travel abroad and attempt to re-enter the United States while the Nonimmigrant Proclamation is in force. [read post]
Perhaps most notably, all those registered with an infected blood support scheme before April 1, 2025, including living infected people and bereaved partners, will receive regular support payments for life. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 7:04 am by Theo Francis
 Or perhaps they’re there because Newmont Mining (NEM) has nervous lawyers — or wants to make a point about congressional meddling. [read post]