Search for: "In re C Children" Results 1461 - 1480 of 2,937
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 4:00 am by Lisa Gelman
A proposed amendment to the Divorce Act, Bill C-78, indicates that parental alienation should influence family court decisions. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:24 am by Eugene Volokh
Children can’t give such consent, especially when they’re infants but also even when they’re older, since the consent must be sufficiently mature. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Intitulé :CHU de Québec c. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 11:30 pm
That’s why we’re dependent on people who come from somewhere else. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:31 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Parents’ Lawsuit Against Apple for In-App Purchases by Minor Children Moves Forward — In re Apple In-App Purchase Litigation. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:30 am by Heather Staskiel, Attorney
In addition, if the veteran dies before his initial claim is re-decided under Nehmer, the VA still must decide the claim and pay, in priority order, his spouse, children of any age, his parents, or his estate. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 5:52 pm by Russell Knight
But, if you’re prepared, you can use your second home as a strategic advantage in your upcoming Illinois divorce. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 5:10 pm by Russell Knight
Or the deductions for children born after the marriage? [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 7:43 am by Russell Knight
” In re RLS, 844 NE 2d 22 – Ill: Supreme Court 2006 If both parents are dead, close relatives can invoke a right to visit a child. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 11:51 am by Rachel Casper
It is not uncommon to see a family of four eating dinner out with both parents and children on their phones. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  They’re extremely weak as a result. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
Pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5722), I hereby suspend the application of section 201(a) of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended (22 U.S.C. 5721(a)), to the following statutes:(a) section 103 of the Immigration Act of 1990 (8 U.S.C. 1152 note);(b) sections 203(c), 212(l), and 221(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1153(c), 1182(l), and 1201(c),… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
Finding it would serve no public purpose, the master recommended that none be re-tried.[13] That meant 4,500 cases of children appearing in that court from 2003 to 2008.[14] On October 29, 2009, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
C-46, did not provide a defence for the appellant’s use of force against the individual. [read post]