Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 2"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 1,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am
(2) Notwithstanding anything in the Official Secrets Act, 1923 (19 of 1923) nor any of the exemptions permissible in accordance with sub-section (1), a public authority may allow access to information, if public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interests. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
See Uniform Probate Code § 2-1106, cmt. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 9:45 am
First of all, they’re muppets. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:18 am
Or petitions to cancel by people who are harmed by the registration. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:42 pm
Flagstar Bancorp (Patently-O) CAFC reverses rejections in reexamination of 7 of 8 NTP patents: In re NTP (WHDA) (Patents Post-Grant) ITC: ALJ Gildea grants-in-part respondent, Canon’s, motion for summary determination of invalidity in Certain Motion-Sensitive Sound Effects Devices and Image Display Devices (337-TA-773) (ITC Law Blog) ITC reviews and vacates ALJ Luckern summary determination ruling on domestic industry in Certain Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music And Data… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:56 pm
SURRENDERING YOUR HOME IN BANKRUPTCY: PART 2 by: Tracy L. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
Every oral argument and judicial ruling, going back over a year now, prompts a new round of press releases and re-jiggering of briefs for the next case. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:22 pm
” See In re Vesta Ins. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:30 pm
§§ 301 et seq., are intended to "permit any party to petition the [PTO] to review the efficacy of a patent, following its issuance, on the basis of new information about preexisting technology that may have escaped review at the time of the initial examination. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Union of India & Others (1996) 2 SCC 749, the Court considered the earlier decisions and held that the writ petition under article 32 of the Constitution assailing the correctness of a decision of the Supreme Court on merits or claiming reconsideration is not maintainable. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
PIMS contains data on initial petition approvals and on L blanket petitions that were approved in 2004 or later. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
Nov. 2, 2009). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
Nov. 2, 2009). [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:15 am
I don’t see why they wouldn’t do #2 or #3. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
The amended petition included Langford's affidavit attaching several documents, including StaxxRing's financial records. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
Moreover, this filing date would extend back to any foreign priority date, effectively overruling In re Hilmer.[5] As in current practice under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:52 pm
(See this news release for a link to download a .pdf of the petition - h/t: Pageantmaster.) [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:47 am
364 F.3d at 365 n.2. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:47 am
364 F.3d at 365 n.2. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:17 pm
” In 2009, National Grid and Deepwater Wind submitted their initial PPA to the PUC (the “2009 PPA”). [read post]
