Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3" Results 1461 - 1480 of 7,889
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2015, 3:37 am
The Board therefore looked to the following factual framework in considering the ownership issue:(1) which party created and first affixed the mark to the product;(2) which party's name appeared with the trademark on packaging and promotional materials;(3) which party maintained the quality and uniformity of the product, including technological changes;(4) which party does the consuming public believe stands behind the product, e.g., to whom customers direct… [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:57 am
Chrysler does not deserve aid until it can present compelling new-generation vehicles. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:12 pm by Adam Levitin
  (2) Peggy Peterson is really Stormy Daniels (the nom-de-porn of Stephanie Clifford). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:00 am by Shahram Miri
Since the deed requires a notarized signature, John will need to submit proof to the notary that he is John Baker when he signs the deed. 2. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:36 am by John Gordon
  The spate of 2010 and 2011 restaurant activity has to do with (1) a general reopening of lending after the 2008-2009 recession, (2) lower corporate debt rates, and (3) PE firms with funds that must be put to use. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:35 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
A new obligation in the revised regulations requires contractors to send pieces of background info to the ESDS upon the first job listing: (1) the company is a federal contractor subject to VEVRAA; (2) the contractor desires priority referrals of protected veterans; (3) the name and location of each hiring location in the state; and (4) the contact information for the hiring officer at each location, including the identity of any third party search companies. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm by Cicely Wilson
The Supreme Court reversed, holding (1) a parentage agreement is a valid, enforceable contract unless its enforcement is contrary to the best interests of the child; (2) none of the traditional defenses to the enforcement of a contact applied in this case to render the agreement unenforceable; and (3) the circuit court erred in rendering its custody and placement decision without consideration of the agreement. [read post]
The answer to the above question depended on: 1. the interpretation and application of the FA 1989, s 83(2) (read with sub-s (1) of the same section) (the “First Issue“); and 2. the interpretation and application of the FA 1989, s 83(3) (read with sub-s (4) of the same section) (the “Second Issue“). [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Thus elements 1 and 3 of the Section 2(a) test were met.However, as to the second element, the Society failed to show that PIERCE-ARROW points uniquely and unmistakably to it. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The Delaware lawsuit went to trial and the jury found against Versys on three grounds: (1) intentional misrepresentation; (2) breach of contract regarding misrepresentations and warranties under the APA; and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. [read post]