Search for: "LEVY V. LEVY" Results 1461 - 1480 of 3,416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2019, 3:06 am by Walter Olson
See whether your intuitions are consistent across 1) boycotts of Israel, 2) wedding cake refusals, and 3) SCOTUS’s 1982 decision in NAACP v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm by Danny Jacobs
Customs officials levied a $4,000 tax on it upon arrival because it was, in their view, a hunk of metal. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:49 pm by James Romoser
  The case, Jack Daniel’s Properties Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 8:39 pm
  Here's the abstract: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 9:00 pm
The courts have heard a constitutional challenge to the law, Combs v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:01 am by Ezra Rosser
Jacobs The World Is Round: Why We Must Assure Equal Access to Civil Justice The Honorable Jon Levy Reflections of an Access to Justice Chair The Honorable Kermit V. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:07 am by Marie Nganele
Joseph Arena emphasizes this important lesson and why associations need to be familiar with their governing documents in, “THIS CASE: Desch v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
.'” [Anthony Faiola, Washington Post] Free speech, trademark law intersect in NAACP suit over critical parody [Paul Alan Levy] Without leeway for anonymous campaign speech, it’ll be hard to oust the retaliation-happy likes of Joe Arpaio [Robert Robb, Arizona Republic via Coyote] Legal blogger in court: “Partial Victory In Patterico’s Free Speech Case Before Ninth Circuit” [Ken at Popehat] European court: website liable for reader comments… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:28 am by Conor McEvily
SCOTUSblog’s online symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 7:35 am
But it pales in comparison to the deposition described by Shannon Duffy in today's Legal Intelligencer: A federal judge has levied sanctions of more than $29,000 on a lawyer and his client after finding that a deposition was a "spectacular failure" because of the client's constant use of vulgar language and insults and dodging or refusing to answer questions, and his lawyer's failure to rein him in.In his 44-page opinion in GMAC Bank v. [read post]