Search for: "LEVY V. LEVY" Results 1461 - 1480 of 3,416
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2015, 4:49 pm
This is the case I blogged about Tuesday; Paul Alan Levy’s post discusses the case in much more detail — if you’re interested in trademark law and free speech, check it out. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:54 am by Joy Waltemath
The portion of the judgment denying the plaintiff’s request for attorneys’ fees was affirmed (Roganti v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:00 am
Ken Levy, Louisiana State University Law Center, is publishing Does Situationism Excuse? [read post]
13 May 2015, 9:09 am by CBA Futures
” I propose some answers to that question: Differential entity-licensing fees: Where the differences seek to encourage provision of low-income A2J services or to penalize failure to provide; Redistributive entity-licensing fees: Where a universal fee is set high enough to permit revenue to be redistributed by the regulator to entities that target improving low-income A2J; Conditional entity-licensing: Conditions might include: Mandatory minimum levels of low-income A2J service delivery; Code… [read post]
7 May 2015, 4:00 am by Steven B. Levy
Levy’s new book: Legal Project Management Field Guide: Five Tools for Busy Professionals. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 5:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
Earlier this month, a unanimous Illinois Supreme Court held in Illinois State Treasurer v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:59 am by Ben
The levy is to compensate copyright owners but the NCC would retain a percentage to fund anti-piracy operations and promote creativity. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 2:56 am
The details of the respective copyright levies should be fixed on short notice in order to safeguard full compliance with EU law. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:26 am
Paul Levy, over at Public Citizen, has an interesting discussion of a recent decision by the Virginia Supreme Court in a case (Yelp v Hadeed Carpet Cleaning) involving the right to speak anonymously. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 3:35 am by Melanie Davidson, Justis
It was common ground that Welsh Ministers do not possess general fiscal powers, and even acting on assumption that the Assembly did have competence to levy charges for Welsh NHS services, the Bill was not sufficiently related to the purpose and effect of raising money which can or will be used to cover part of the costs of the Welsh NHS under section 108(4). [read post]