Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 1461 - 1480 of 21,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2017, 12:05 pm by Neumann Law Group
In moving for summary judgment, the appeals court explained, defendants had an initial burden of showing that one or more elements of appellant’s cause of action could not be established. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:05 pm by Neumann Law Group
In moving for summary judgment, the appeals court explained, defendants had an initial burden of showing that one or more elements of appellant’s cause of action could not be established. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:00 pm by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
The defendant lab argued that pursuant to New York case law, a lab could not be held liable for failing to advise a patient of a cancer diagnosis when the patient’s physician received the results as well. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:14 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
According to a recent article published by the Los Angeles Times, defendants in mesothelioma lawsuits can now be held liable for what are known as “take-home” asbestos cases. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 4:49 pm
Downloader’s Blues, indeed! [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 2:42 am by Berniard Law Firm
Morgan City then filed a third-party demand against both Legacy and RedIron, arguing that Morgan City itself was not liable for any damages due to Legacy’s and RedIron’s failure to comply with Louisiana’s Overhead Power Line Safety Act (OPLSA). [read post]
” With a personal injury case, such as a pedestrian-versus-vehicle accident, the plaintiff’s case may often revolve around demonstrating that the defendant driver was negligent and, if that driver was working when the accident occurred, that the employer is vicariously liable for the driver’s negligence. [read post]
30 May 2022, 3:01 am by Purnel Gangiah
The plaintiff sued the defendant retail store for damages that she sustained as a result of slipping and falling on a spillage of cake flour on the floor. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 12:35 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
Recently, the California Court of Appeal addressed whether an individual who hired a pool contractor to build a pool and spa at his home was negligent and liable for injuries suffered by one of the contractor’s employees. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 12:35 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
Recently, the California Court of Appeal addressed whether an individual who hired a pool contractor to build a pool and spa at his home was negligent and liable for injuries suffered by one of the contractor’s employees. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:30 am
  That court explained that the Bond is only insuring that Defendant is liable for any construction that has not been performed, and found no evidence of an intention that Defendant should be bound to dispute resolution provisions of the MSA. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
It is based on the firm’s memorandum, “Federal Jury Finds Defendant Liable in SEC ‘Shadow Trading’ Case,” dated April 7, 2024, and available here. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:36 am by Earl Drott
Decision of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas The defendant argued that it was not vicariously liable for the driver’s negligence because it was not the driver’s “statutory employer” and that, even if it were the statutory employer, it was still not liable because the driver was not acting in the scope of his employment at the time of the wreck. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:36 am by Earl Drott
Decision of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas The defendant argued that it was not vicariously liable for the driver’s negligence because it was not the driver’s “statutory employer” and that, even if it were the statutory employer, it was still not liable because the driver was not acting in the scope of his employment at the time of the wreck. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 10:06 pm by Michael Atkins
One of the issues in the case was contributory infringement — whether Google should be liable for enabling counterfeiters to infringe Rosetta Stone’s trademark. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 9:32 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
However, not only can manufacturers be held liable, but also retailers and distributors may be held liable under certain circumstances. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 9:32 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
However, not only can manufacturers be held liable, but also retailers and distributors may be held liable under certain circumstances. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 2:41 am by Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
Salinas, a man borrowed the defendants car to pick up his friend at a restaurant. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Phelps jury held defendants liable not just for intentional infliction of emotional distress, but also for invasion of privacy. [read post]