Search for: "Likely v. State"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 82,258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 8:28 am
The state trial court dismissed on the pleadings and California Court of Appeal upheld the dismissal, both relying on Geier v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
The case is State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 6:39 am
Activision has responded in federal court to a lawsuit originally filed in California state court by No Doubt over Activision’s use of the band’s likeness in “Band Hero. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
Francis v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 12:15 am
In CSHV 1999 Harrison, LLC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:58 am
Reece v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 8:56 am
Aguiniga v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Credit: Federal Circuit (what it looks like to argue there) One week ago, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:22 pm
Under the effects test, “the defendant allegedly must have (1) committed an intentional act, (2) expressly aimed at the forum state, (3) causing harm that the defendant knows is likely to be suffered in the forum state. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 8:28 am
Virginia and Brooke v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:16 am
Despite a ruling by the California Supreme Court in favor of defendant in Webb v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:00 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
”) State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 9:08 am
The accompanying text stated: “Women are like parking spots[.] [read post]
11 May 2015, 12:18 am
Now, thanks to the recent Supreme Court decision in B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:12 am
Looks like they may have a winning strategy — if they can police the state-by-state sales restrictions. [read post]
16 May 2011, 4:30 am
Marroquin v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 8:04 am
The legislature passes a law that’s likely unconstitutional, but the law doesn’t provide for enforcement by any state actors. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:25 pm
Samsung and FTC v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 12:17 pm
First, it adopts as an overriding value the bureaucratic imperative of treating like cases alike. [read post]
