Search for: "Long v State"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 45,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm
The United States Supreme Court of Appeals heard oral arguments today in Caperton v. [read post]
7 Dec 2024, 1:54 pm
Not only is the State required to produce evidence under Article 39.14, but it remains compelled to produce Brady material under a long line of precedent from the United States Supreme Court and federal and state appeals courts interpreting Brady. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 11:39 am
Earlier this year I litigated State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:52 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:14 am
The decision is Gross v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
Chief Justice John Marshall’s tenure and the long reign of justices during the “Lochner Era” are a testament to this reality. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm
AT&T v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Comment The Justices lamented that it had taken four long years for such important points of statutory construction to have reached the apex court. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
Long Mtn. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:31 am
Starbucks and Winans v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:00 pm
The state proceedings took until 1998. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:38 am
Further, although no law explicitly permits unincorporated associations to enter into contracts, the Court indicated that this is a long-recognized and uncontroversial power (see Miller v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in the case of Muldrow v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:36 am
" It also states that "Lessors and Lessee agree that the holding in the case of Heritage Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:08 pm
Apologies for being silent so long. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 3:50 am
[www.angel-diaz.us]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:41 am
There was no rule of construction and no rule of law which stated that a reinsurer must respond to every valid claim under the insurance irrespective of the terms of the reinsurance.The most important aspect to the decision was the way in which the Lords distinguished the present case from the decision of the House of Lords in Vesta v Butcher [1989] AC 852. [read post]
