Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
Morley & Ors v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
18 May 2023, 7:42 am
Four cases in the House of Lords or Supreme Court’ at [17] ff. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:57 am
(R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ¶ 77, supra.). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
The House of Lords held that the words were not capable of referring to him. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hodge. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am
Introduction of Lord Falconer’s Bill, and summary of Ross v Switzerland [2013] ECHR 429. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 5:10 pm
In the state of New York, a dog can be described as vicious even if the current case is the first time that the dog has ever bitten anyone. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:27 am
In delivering the judgment Lord Mance stated that adjudication is intended to be a speedy provisional measure, pending final determination. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 10:53 am
As Lord Kitchin stated, Dr. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:43 am
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm
It involves either an interference with the legal rights of an owner or a person with exclusive possession of land, including an interest in land such as an easement or a profit à prendre, or interference with the amenity of the land, that is to say the right to use and enjoy it, which is an inherent facet of a right of exclusive possession: Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd (1997) AC 655 687G–688E (Lord Goff citing FH Newark, “The Boundaries of Nuisance” 65… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm
It involves either an interference with the legal rights of an owner or a person with exclusive possession of land, including an interest in land such as an easement or a profit à prendre, or interference with the amenity of the land, that is to say the right to use and enjoy it, which is an inherent facet of a right of exclusive possession: Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd (1997) AC 655 687G–688E (Lord Goff citing FH Newark, “The Boundaries of Nuisance” 65… [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
Fourthly, there was a side debate about whether the summary of the Hardial Singh principles in R (I) v SSHD [2002] EWCA Civ 888 by Dyson LJ (as he then was) was accurate. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:47 am
Although the Court of Appeal never suggests this analysis, the case invites comparison with sufficiency cases in which the principle of an inventive concept derived from the specification can have a general application across a claim.This Kat notices that the composition of the Court of Appeal again yokes together two specialist intellectual property judges (Lords Justices Floyd and Lewison) in the panel of three (the other member of the court being Lord Justice Longmore), and that… [read post]
