Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 4,049
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2016, 12:05 am
R (Public Law Project) v The Lord Chancellor, heard 18 April 2016. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm
Lord Lester QC wrote a curious article in the Daily Telegraph criticising the celebrity injunction as being part of ‘an attack on the freedom of the press. [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:57 am
And, even though the FTC does not have the authority to impose civil money penalties for these types of violations of the FTC Act, state Attorneys General appear to be getting in on the act. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Hopefully BMG v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:00 am
R (Public Law Project) v The Lord Chancellor, heard 18 April 2016. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
As found by the Federal Court in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 2:15 am
On the issue of R (Francis) Lord Wilson stated that it was wrongly decided. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
Lord Hodge relied on dicta from Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham County Council [1961] AC 636, which held that a planning condition can only be void for uncertainty if it can be given no sensible or ascertainable meaning. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
It is now clear that the subjects in charge of collecting the fair compensation for private copying (e.g. collective management organisations) can bring proceedings before the courts of the Member State where the harm arising from missed payments is felt. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:00 am
R (Public Law Project) v The Lord Chancellor, heard 18 April 2016. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:05 am
In delivering the lead judgment Lord Carnwath stated that Asset Land’s activities amounted to operating “collective investment schemes” under section 235 of the 2000 Act, and were thus “regulated activities” for the purpose of section 19. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:00 am
In regards to the proportionality argument, Lord Clarke stated that, in this case, the absence of a specified time limit for detention does not infringe the principles in R v Governor of Durham Prison, Ex P Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
” [Abrams v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:03 am
The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland), heard 8-9 March 2016. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
(Lord Bingham, A-G’s Ref (No 5 of 2002), 2004) "this impenetrable statute … one of the most complex and unsatisfactory statutes currently in force. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
(Lord Bingham, A-G’s Ref (No 5 of 2002), 2004) "this impenetrable statute … one of the most complex and unsatisfactory statutes currently in force. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
(Lord Bingham, A-G’s Ref (No 5 of 2002), 2004) "this impenetrable statute … one of the most complex and unsatisfactory statutes currently in force. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:53 am
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:00 am
The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland), heard 8-9 March 2016. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 5:47 am
Peabody receives state subsidy by way of grants and to separate the properties transferred from CEC is to ignore the realities of the situation. [read post]
