Search for: "MATTER OF INQUIRY INTO M M"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 2,737
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2014, 12:40 pm
A New York Divorce Lawyer said X and his sister, M, testified in favor of X's petition. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:33 pm
& Payne, Marilyn A. 2012 Link Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2009 Payne, Julien D. 2009 Link Children and the Law: Essays in Honour of Professor Nicholas Bala Anand, Sanjeev 2011 Link Civil Actions for Uncivilized Acts Larocque, Francois 2010 Link The Civil Code of Quebec in Chart Form Le May, Denis 2006 Link The Civil Courtroom: Professionalism to Build Rapport Hollander, John 2013 Link Civil Litigation Sossin, Lorne 2010 Link The Colour of Justice: Policing Race in Canada Tanovich, David… [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 4:17 am
Andrew M. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 3:02 pm
If we take its analysis seriously, I’m not sure I know what police investigations are still constitutional. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:28 am
Still, even recognizing this shift in analysis, Hirshfeld told examiners: “[T]he basic inquiries to determine subject matter eligibility remain the same as explained in MPEP 2106(I). [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:27 am
I’m skeptical, but it will be interesting to watch. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 8:32 am
Savage & Donald M. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 6:06 am
'"But shouldn't it still matter what your details happen to be? [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 11:27 pm
As I said, I’m not an expert in civil remedies, so maybe I’m just missing something. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 11:44 pm
Halliburton would present to the DOJ a comprehensive, risk-based FCPA and anti-corruption due diligence work plan which would address, among other things, the use of agents and other third parties; commercial dealings with state-owned customers; any joint venture, teaming or consortium arrangements; customs and immigration matters; tax matters; and any government licenses and permits. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:37 pm
[Full disclosure: I'm friends with one of the lawyers for Motorola and talked briefly about the case with him, but I had no involvement with this motion and have my own views on the matter.] [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 8:36 am
Naive as I am, I thought that was precisely what the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause, and Jefferson’s Wall, were designed to prevent: governmental intrusion and inquiry into matters of individual conscience. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
Lee, that "[w]hen followers of a particular sect enter into commercial activity as a matter of choice, the limits they accept on their own conduct as a matter of conscience and faith are not to be superimposed on the statutory schemes which are binding on others in that activity,” at least where “[g]ranting an exemption . . . to an employer operates to impose the employer’s religious faith on the employees. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:01 am
Justices Waterman and Mansfield dissented (Goodpaster v Schwan’s Home Service, Inc, June 27, 2014, Cady, M). [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:45 am
I’m well aware – as a former programmer and as a lawyer who has represented software vendors – that source code is sensitive. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:41 pm
I’m well aware – as a former programmer and as a lawyer who has represented software vendors – that source code is sensitive. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:39 pm
-Steven M. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:39 pm
-Steven M. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:56 am
That opinion was joined in full by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, Anthony M. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 am
DOJ periodically revisits most antitrust consent decrees as a matter of best practices. [read post]
