Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 42,191
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am
On appeal, the court held that there was no new evidence that could reasonably be expected to affect the result. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm
The Council decisions on the conclusion of the Istanbul Convention on behalf of the EU were carefully crafted, confining the EU’s accession to matters related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
If so, that is the end of the matter; for the court, as well as the agency, must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Over-regulation of matters historically left to the discretion of directors restricts the flexibility and creative energy that directors bring to a board. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm
Further finding no inventive concept at step two, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling that the claims were patent ineligible under § 101. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:39 am
Strict rules of evidence and sensible guidelines in the form of jury instructions, typically lead to the correct result. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:10 am
G 2/21 and T 0116/18: Case catch-upIn G 2/21, the EBA considered whether post-published evidence may be taken into account for inventive step. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
Central to their argument was what they called a "global" rule. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
My point is not to suggest that these presumptions and reality shaping rules are either good or bad, but to suggest that each is worth examining not just for their consequences in the immediate historical context, but for the hidden or forgotten deep premises from which these presumptions appear to emerge "naturally. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 12:33 pm
Rule of Evidence 803(17) Pa. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:28 am
State Attorney, a decision from Palestine, the Court protects freedom of expression in private conversations but fails to consider political expression on a matter of public interest. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:46 pm
Here’s another potential bright-line rule: does any substantial evidence show defense counsel was audibly snoring? [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:00 am
The basic rule then is that applicants can register marks containing political and social justice messaging, so long as those marks also serve a sufficient commercial source-identifying function. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
Still the prospect of further scrutiny by the Court matters. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
The key rules are as follows. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 7:53 am
Indeed, DIA has proclaimed its respect for the “presumption of innocence” in such matters. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:24 am
(Editors’ Note: This is the latest in Just Security’s weekly series keeping readers up to date on developments at the United Nations at the intersection of national security, human rights, and the rule of law.) [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am
So while the state and Glossip are at odds over an important matter, they are not at odds on anything in this case. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Legal and Regulatory Developments SPOTLIGHT: ‘More Than Enough’ Amex Evidence for Visa, Mastercard TrialLaw360 – January 23, 2024 (subscription required) Visa and Mastercard appear bound for trial on antitrust claims over network rules forcing merchants to accept the companies’ cards without the ability to steer consumers to cheaper swipe fee options, under a New York federal judge’s ruling unsealed Monday finding sufficient evidence… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:15 am
It was found that none of the exceptions applied in this matter. [read post]
