Search for: "MATTER OF T H"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 6,318
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
H. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
And the subject matter—“unilateralist presidencies and submissive legislatures”—is of great interest to me. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Why wouldn’t it be equally problematic as an abuse of power to withhold the military aid to strong-arm the foreign power into generating negative press for his opponent directly, even if the latter isn’t covered by a criminal statute? [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, February 4, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.: Governance Studies at The Brookings Institution will convene a panel of policy experts to discuss President Trump’s 2020 State of the Union address to Congress and the nation. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 3:36 pm
We know that Justices Alito and Thomas do not attend the addresses as a matter of principle. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
Her argument is that he was in the United States on an H-1B visa, which isn’t a permanent status. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:47 am
Weffe H. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 7:09 am
” According to Easterbrook, “[h]ow much burden is ‘undue’ is a matter of judgment, which depends on what the burden would be (something the injunction prevents us from knowing) and whether that burden is excessive (a matter of weighing costs against benefits, which one judge is apt to do differently from another, and which judges as a group are apt to do differently from state legislators). [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 5:01 am
Dep't of Fish & Wildlife, decided Friday by Judge Lawrence J. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 7:57 am
All these matters had been properly considered by the Deputy Judge and her decision that it was disproportionate to grant the injunction was one that was properly open to her. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 7:57 am
All these matters had been properly considered by the Deputy Judge and her decision that it was disproportionate to grant the injunction was one that was properly open to her. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 7:17 am
These missteps may well matter politically and may unduly complicate what should be a rather straightforward argument. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:23 am
Many people have read articles about the jobs that supposedly won’t exist in the future, which is something to keep an eye on. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 1:47 pm
(H/T: Eugene Volokh). [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
Democrats were apparently supposed to say, “We’re all terrified of Trump winning, so we can’t do anything but be unified at all times. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 4:59 pm
In its current form, important elements are dangerously vague, and there is an unpardonable oversight in the drafting – like the famous mint, there is a hole in the middle of the Bill; unlike the mint, the hole isn’t meant to be there; and I will return to this point in the last paragraph below. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Justice Côté is dissenting. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Family Court Act 1089 (d) 2 (vii) was amended by adding a new clause (H) and Social Services Law §358-a, subd. 3 was amended by adding a new paragraph (g).Laws of 2019, Ch 716, enacted and effective December 20, 2019, amended Domestic Relations Law and the Civil Rights Law. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm
(H/t to the inestimable CA3blog.) [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 3:30 pm
As yet these aren’t up on the justice.gov.uk site, and while I’ve seen the revised versions, I can’t link to them or add a file. [read post]
