Search for: "Mark May"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 64,930
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2010, 12:47 pm
While May 2010 was the slowest month for new filings (with 20 new lawsuits), we have seen an increase of new false marking suits in June and July, with 35 filed in June and 46 thus far filed in July. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:42 pm
Now I think, if the FBI actually sees this, Mark may have incriminated himself, if they will actually do anything about it, which I doubt. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 1:24 pm
Security researchers gained access into Private Facebook Pages with unusual search strings to get around search restrictions where "search preferences, or "search settings" were not changed.Even if the page was marked private, by not changing the "search settings," spiders were able to index and catalog the pages.One of the search strings reported in Wired include "Women interested in Women. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 6:11 pm
The use of "sensibly" in Judge Hacon's judgements is itself becoming something of a trade mark. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:11 pm
The Examining Attorney submitted into evidence two third-party registrations that showed that trucks and trailers may emanate from the same source. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 11:44 am
So I may have missed some of the discussion.... [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:07 am
Moreover, both marks contain no other elements, either design or words.Although there may be some differences in commercial impression (one rider in control, the other falling off), the overall commercial impression of the polo players is "very similar. [read post]
26 May 2024, 5:46 am
” A “mark-up” session on the revised bill was held on Thursday, May 23, when the bill was discussed by the House Subcommittee on Innovation, Data, and Commerce, approved, and sent to the full House Energy and Commerce Committee for approval (see video of the mark-up session here). [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 12:07 pm
A mark that is primarily merely a surname may be registered on the Supplemental Register in an application under Section 1 or Section 44 of the Trademark Act. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 9:48 am
May 1998 - What Is It That You Don't Remember? [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 2:30 am
The burden of proof, when genuine use of the earlier mark is questioned, is on the opponent and it is clear that, if the evidence submitted by the opponent is weak, there is also a risk that the Opponent may indeed lose its own marks.The decision is also interesting since it signals that there is not necessarily a clear concept when it comes to trade marks relating to sports, in this case football. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:24 pm
" At at the "School Law" blog of Education Week, Mark Walsh has a post titled "Justices Weigh School Interviews on Sex Abuse. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:33 am
Thus, it may be argued that Powers is trying to pass her goods off as if they were produced by Pringles. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:38 am
The allegations demonstrated, at most, that USA Rugby may have used its own mark in a manner which had the potential to confuse the public. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:55 am
" Opposer Karsten claimed likelihood of confusion with its registered mark PING and proved that the mark is famous in connection with golf-related equipment and services. [read post]
Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is This "Statue of Liberty" Design Mark Scandalous Under Section 2(a)?
3 Dec 2013, 4:55 am
The applied-for mark does not depict the statute in a threatening pose; in fact, the depiction may be viewed as "consistent with" the Constitutional right to bear arms.The Board was not "free of doubt" that the mark will be perceived as scandalous by a substantial composite of Americans. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
Seriously, though, there seems to be a difference between an "ornamentality" refusal and an "informational" refusal: the former may be overcome by showing acquired distinctiveness, I think, whereas the latter cannot be. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:59 pm
The false marking statute includes a bounty hunter (i.e., qui tam) provision providing that “[a]ny person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:56 am
In 2005, the mark was registered.In 2012, plaintiff Toni Klement filed an action for cancellation of the mark for lack of genuine use. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Appeal dismissed.5. 23 is not a magic numberMaison Margiela Magic Numbers, EUIPO Board of Appeal Case R 1967/2022-1 (May 2023)Retromark might be said to have something of a fetish for non-traditional marks (it’s not alone?). [read post]
