Search for: "PROFESSORS OF SECOND AMENDMENT LAW" Results 1461 - 1480 of 4,985
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am by David Kopel
My own scholarship on Indian history and law has not focused on the Indian Commerce Clause, but rather on issues related to my textbooks Colorado Constitutional Law and History and Firearms Law and the Second Amendment. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 11:14 am by Ken White
Here's the problem: law professors have a habit of taking what they think the law should be and portraying it as what the law is. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:43 am by Rick Garnett
Garnett is Professor of Law, Concurrent Professor of Political Science, and the Director of the Program on Church, State & Society at the University of Notre Dame. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:17 am by Ronald Mann
It is the second step, the “public rights” doctrine, on which the justices divide. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:08 pm by Adam Levitin
It includes the head of the ALI (a law professor) and the head of NCCUSL, but neither is a commercial law expert. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 9:36 am by Carolyn Shapiro
Carolyn Shapiro is a professor of law and founder and co-director of the Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States at Chicago-Kent College of Law, and she is of counsel at Schnapper-Casteras PLLC. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 3:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
” Indeed, the Seventh Amendment’s provision that the jury trial shall be preserved in common law cases, coupled with the Fifth Amendment’s provision that “due process of law” is applicable in all cases involving property or liberty, makes clear that “due process of law” can be had even in cases not arising under the common law. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:51 pm by Darius Whelan
I've updated the listings of events as follows:Thu. 26 Nov. 2015:European Data Privacy Rights and Democratic Politics: A Tangled Web - Professor Deirdre Curtin,Irish Society for European Law, DublinDetails at https://www.isel.ie/event/view/108/n-a27-29 Nov. 2015:The Law Lecturer: Enhancing Academic Life - Annual Conference of the Irish Association of Law Teachers 2015 – Salthill Hotel, GalwayDetails… [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
All that remains is a merits vote (which requires a mere 50 senators) and then a second vote in the House of Representatives (because the Senate amended the RMA).Readers might be wondering why the RMA—which would codify a federal right to same-sex marriage—is needed. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Igor De Lazari and Carlos Bolonha
Carlos Bolonha is the Vice Dean and Professor of Law at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Law School. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 8:26 pm
If you would like to read an excellently reasoned exposition of why this is so, go no farther than this short amicus brief filed last week on behalf of 18 law school professors in support of the petition brought by the Rt. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 2:09 pm
If you would like to read an excellently reasoned exposition of why this is so, go no farther than this short amicus brief filed last week on behalf of 18 law school professors in support of the petition brought by the Rt. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In a large diverse country, there will frequently be state and local differences that justify different approaches, as University of Chicago Law Professor Eric Posner explained: “Nearly all laws affect different states differently. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Previously, he served as the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law. [read post]
The Court’s focus was no longer on whether a law disadvantaged racial minorities or women, but rather on whether the challenged law employed a racial or gender classification. [read post]
A second example from his opinion (there are many more): Judge Kacsmaryk criticizes how the FDA relaxed risk-mitigation plans for mifepristone over the years. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The second is what she calls a dignitary or expressive harm: the government’s speech might treat a citizen or groups of citizens as less than equal. [read post]