Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 6,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2010, 12:20 am
See, e.g., 1AC ¶;¶ 32, 198. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:21 am
McClean v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 1:51 pm
In its judgment in Case C-429/07 Inspecteur van de Belastigdienst v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 5:16 am
See Para. 59 ("Unlike prior grants, this grant was not approved by [unanimous written consent] but rather during a meeting of the Compensation Committee. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:33 am
Streamlining Tuna with Cloves, in both cases we now have: (1) a finding of discrimination (cloves v. menthols in Cloves; stricter labeling requirements in the ETP v. outside the ETP in Tuna) and (2) a finding that the ban on cloves / strict labeling requirements in the ETP are not more trade restrictive than necessary. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 5:44 am
Plaintiff asserts that, as a result, its employees were able to file a class action lawsuit against plaintiff in New York State Supreme Court asserting violations of New York State’s Labor Law and the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) (the “Class Action”), which plaintiff ultimately settled for over one million dollars (Id. at ¶;¶9-12). [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:47 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:56 pm
When the world is in the midst of a public health crisis.Oh, and if the research does not stop, then Article 11 provides that, for such an infringement of Article 4, Member States must provide "penalties [that] shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive." [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:50 pm
Where timing is at issue, and counsel states that the withdrawal is for ethical reasons, then “the court must accept counsel’s answer at face value and not enquire further so as to avoid trenching on potential issues of solicitor-client privilege” (para. 48). [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
To end its term, the Supreme Court today issued its long awaited opinion in Ricci v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 3:08 pm
Stevens decision - as stating that the reforms appear to exceed the Australian federal governments powers. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 9:14 am
The Wisconsin Supreme Court wisely rejected the state’s proposal earlier this week in State v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:19 am
The offending comments Mr Calver’s blog contained various comments (set out at para 33 of the judgment) criticising the conduct and operation of Manorbier Council in general and individual councillors in particular. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:23 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:32 am
Whereas the latter had stated that if Jinse entered into an insolvency procedure, that would trigger a right to rescind and therefore the refund guarantee (Article XII.3), the bonds did not. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:19 pm
” Op. at ¶38 (quoting American Motor Sales Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 6:55 am
¶37. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 10:11 am
Erick Kolthoff Caraballo explicó que la decisión en Menna había sido restringida en United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:18 pm
The best analogy to the Travel Tab refusal is to be found in Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Fila Sport Oceania Pty Ltd (2004) ATPR ¶41-983. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 11:37 am
”The Court states (para. 18) that-- “Read in isolation, that sentence could be interpreted as meaning that the licensee cannot, if the licence has not been entered in the Register, rely on the rights conferred by that licence vis-à-vis third parties, including the party infringing the trade mark. [read post]
