Search for: "People v Challenger"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 18,775
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
In Buchanan v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
One, the plaintiff can challenge those pro-competitive effects as pretextual. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 6:14 am
The Supreme Court did not reach the merits of the equal protection challenges, but during oral argument, several judges expressed skepticism that Congressional Indian affairs enactments that grant privileges or preferences to Indian people could survive scrutiny under an equal protection analysis. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:49 am
” The original suit, LW v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
But plaintiffs challenging federal policies that the restrain deportation of other people have a problem. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 3:58 am
Similarly, the states challenging the DACA program have alleged indistinct injuries similar to those articulated by Texas in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
The UK Cabinet Office is to hand over Whatsapp messages concerning the government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic to the public inquiry, following the High Court’s rejection of their challenge, Cabinet Office v Chair of Covid Inquiry [2023] EWHC 1702 (Admin). [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:46 am
Member will recognise that, although some people feel very strongly about this subject, their numbers are quite small, the challenges the country faces are very great and the time before the next general election is increasingly short. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
An approach more aware of regular people’s concerns must therefore come from the agencies and their work in the courts. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 12:42 pm
A little censorship leads people to watch what they say. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 9:14 am
From L.W. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
" Morever, Justice Gorsuch continued in his majority opinion: "Before us, no party challenges these conclusions. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
Washington v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:11 am
CanadaWard v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:49 pm
See R. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
We will also provide an anonymous reader poll to learn more about what frequency and type of content people prefer to receive. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 3:58 am
In Justice Neil Gorsuch’s major free speech ruling in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:26 pm
But few condemn United States v. [read post]
