Search for: "People v High"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 15,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2016, 11:44 am
The case, Newcomb v Middle Country Central School District, was about a teenager struck by a hit-and-run car while attempting to cross an intersection near his high school. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:44 pm
Justice Edelmann, in West Vancouver (District), v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:37 am
Make UC A Good Neighbor v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:06 am
This holiday week, swept with snow and high winds, brings a case which re-emphasizes our meme that legal malpractice may show up anywhere attorneys are at work. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:08 pm
In Balderas v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
Case citation: People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:39 pm
This is a high hurdle and claimants rarely attempt to surmount it. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 12:10 pm
In Local 703 v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Ctr., 222 AD3d 1160; Matter of Aungst v Family Dollar, 221 AD3d 1222; and Matter of Holder v Office for People with Dev. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Ctr., 222 AD3d 1160; Matter of Aungst v Family Dollar, 221 AD3d 1222; and Matter of Holder v Office for People with Dev. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 12:05 pm
He noted that high-ranking members of the group would likely be able to afford treatment for their family members in other countries. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:40 pm
However, in Cargill v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:11 pm
Indeed, in Doe v. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am
” During his sentence C was transferred from prison to a high security psychiatric hospital. [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:36 pm
The Ninth Circuit in Mendez v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:08 am
The travel ban case, Trump v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 2:07 pm
But he had high profile clients, and that begot more high profile clients. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 3:09 pm
" Forsyth County v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 12:51 am
It, therefore, went ahead to determine MCSN’s counterclaim and entered judgment in MCSN’s favour.On the issue of the status of MCSN as a mere exclusive assignee of copyright, the court placed particular reliance on the case of PMRS v Skye Bank.In the PMRS v Skye Bank case, the Court of Appeal reviewed its previous decisions on the question of MCSN’s standing to sue for copyright infringement when it is not an approved collecting society. [read post]
