Search for: "People v. Childs" Results 1461 - 1480 of 6,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2012, 3:29 pm by Staff
REDUCED TO PROBATION – Sexual Assault and Sexual Conduct with a Minor, State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 4:25 am
When staleness is viewed in context with child pornography, courts have recognized that people suspected of viewing or possessing child pornography commonly retain the illegal material. [read post]
Plaintiffs, who are healthcare providers around the state, argued that the abortion ban “radically reduced” people from making autonomous decisions about whether to bear a child, which leads to a serious deprivation of their fundamental constitutional rights under the Arizona Constitution. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:56 am by Eric Goldman
” And despite Snap’s policy against child exploitation and the distribution of CSAM, the platform’s existing “CSAM detection technology like PhotoDNA and CSAI Match is . . . a poor fit to prevent sexual grooming on Snapchat. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:35 am by Apple Sulit-Peralejo
In the recent decision of the New Jersey Appellate Division Ferstenfeld v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:45 pm by Unknown
Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (Indian Child Welfare Act)The People of the State of South Dakota in the Interest of C.H. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 1:25 pm
  EDITOR'S NOTE:  People should not forget that upon the entry of a final restraining order, there is a legal presumption that the victim should get custody. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 7:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Wells Fargo & Company  (Fraudulent Banking Practices) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlThe People v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A defendant need not commit an affirmative act directed at a child (see People v Hitchcock, 98 NY2d 586, 591 [2002]; People v Johnson, 95 NY2d 368, 371-372 [2002]) nor cause actual harm to a child (see Johnson, 95 NY2d at 371; see also People v Duenas, 190 Misc 2d 801 [App Term, 2d Dept 2002]) to be guilty of Endangering the Welfare of a Child. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:23 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(Indian Child Welfare Act) Tribal Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2020.htmlDonius and Rincon Mushroom Corporation, Inc v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Taglieri, which involves the “habitual residence” provision of an international child-abduction convention. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:18 pm by Record Clearing
As a former Eagle Scout , I was taught to ” help other people at all times ” When I was confronted with what thought was an abused unloved foster child , ” i Offered to see if I could help, by offering ” possible foster or adoptive placement with me. [read post]