Search for: "People v. Grand"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 2,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
From 1795 through 1934, Congress regularly sanctioned people who defied its authority, and many Supreme Court decisions recognized its “inherent” power to do so. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 2:19 pm
What makes this latest ruling, Berishaj v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 1:04 pm
The chief prosecutor in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:00 am
They were ushered into a grand ceremonial courtroom to see if they might be candidates to serve as jurors in the case of the United States of America v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:06 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
In 1986 a federal grand jury indicted Raymond Luc Levasseur, Christopher E. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 11:17 am
” Ultimately, the court issued a restitution order just north of eleven grand. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
We are arresting people coming across the border illegally, and we are jailing them in jails in the state of Texas. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:29 pm
” Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:53 am
The criminal case before the Court in Trump v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm
” People v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
20; Bessette v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Prosecution for draft-dodging Meanwhile, a grand jury indicted Ali for draft evasion; and on June 20, 1967, a jury in the U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:16 am
We note, however, that such questions were improper (see People v Paul, 229 AD2d 932; People v Paul, 212 AD2d 1020, 1021, lv denied 85 NY2d 912; People v Edwards, 167 AD2d 864, lv denied 77 NY2d 877). [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 8:52 am
And the relevant case, Nixon v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:21 pm
Supreme Court case Laird v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
As the confrontation escalates between the House of Representatives and the White House over the production of documents, the appearance of witnesses and compliance with congressional subpoenas, so too have calls for Democrats to initiate impeachment proceedings. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 2:18 am
The Court found that the instance in question could be viewed as falling within the margin of appreciation accorded to member states: ‘the choice of the means calculated to secure compliance with article 8 of the Convention in the sphere of the relations of individuals between themselves is in principle a matter that falls within the contracting states’ margin of appreciation’, referencing the Grand Chamber in Bărbulescu v Romania ([125]). [read post]
