Search for: "People v. London"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 1,929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2011, 12:58 am
In particular, it examines the issues in two English cases, Ladele v London Borough of Islington and McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd, in which professionals lost their jobs because they had a conscientious, and faith-based, objection to providing a particular kind of service to gay and lesbian couples. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
This case was wholly unlike the case of Pieretti v Enfield London Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1104; [2011] PTSR 565 (which held that the section 49A duty complements a housing authority’s duties to the homeless under Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996). [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm
Patrick Bidder is a trainee solicitor in the defamation, privacy and reputation management team at London based law firm Withers. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
It is, therefore, relevant to note that so much was the value attached to the precedent of the highest court that in The London Street Tramways Co. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:53 pm
The appeal, known as ETK v NGN Ltd , was listed in private. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
She previously served as Group Compliance and Ethics Officer for BP plc (London). [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
In the year to 31 March 2010, 85,557 people were examined using Schedule 7 powers. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 11:33 am
Monarchs have not always been as likable as the young couple from London, UK. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:47 am
Do you have any idea if there is any case law or statutory provision which could prove there is an infringement of art.10 as regards the London Olympic Games Act? [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:06 am
They had been painted by Congo, a chimpanzee at the London Zoo. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
She went to stay with her sister and niece in a one-bedroom flat in London. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
She went to stay with her sister and niece in a one-bedroom flat in London. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:50 am
Regulation 2(1) of the Business Protection from Misleading Marketing Regulations 2008 has been successfully invoked in a case involving a different scam (the sending out of letters concerning the renewal of non-existent contracts for the repair and maintenance of printers and faxes), London Borough of Croydon v Austin Hogarth [2011] EWHC 1126 (QB), 5 April 2011 (unreported and not available on BAILII -- but the Kat has a copy if you want to see it). [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:08 pm
Last month injunction notices were fixed to lampposts outside Cheryl Cole’s former home in North London. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 4:51 am
For the London Free Press - July 4, 2011 – Read this on Canoe You have designed the perfect logo for your business. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:22 am
Pollard is responding to the European Court of Human Rights ruling in Sufi and Elmi v UK, in which the court ruled that the situation in Somalia was so dire that except in very limited scenarios it will not be possible to deport people back to the country. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:45 am
“People do not respect this law. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 2:43 pm
The main difference between Nokia v IPCom is this, though: the characters in soap operas are not real people: their often bizarre and chaotic responses to the positions in which they find themselves are scripted and deprive them of any freedom of action. [read post]
