Search for: "Price v Price" Results 1461 - 1480 of 18,241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2014, 5:44 am
  The court explained that certifying a class asserting such a damage theory would be “patently inappropriate,” and, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Comcast Corporation v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:08 am by John Jascob
In a new lawsuit in California’s Northern District, a family trust is alleging that Lyft Inc. misled investors in documents supporting its recent IPO regarding the company's national market share, safety issues regarding its bike sharing business, and labor issues, causing the share price to be artificially inflated and resulting in investor losses when the truth came out (Malig v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 12:13 am
Authors Guild v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 8:20 am
  If so, and  banks are hindered by an accounting rule that forces them to  "mark" them  down to an artificially low "market" price, then FASB's change of heart could help them eventually see more money. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 10:14 am
., Milberg Weiss, Bernstein Liebhard, and Schiffrin & Barroway — lick their wounds over the Second Circuit ruling that the lawsuit alleging fraud in the pricing of IPOs can’t proceed as a class action. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:10 am by A. Hunter Faulkner, Esq.
Recently, a federal jury in the Middle District of Missouri found the National Association of Realtors (“NAR”) and two major real estate brokerages—Keller Willams and HomeServices of America—liable under United States antitrust laws for conspiring to fix prices in the class action lawsuit, Burnett v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 1:52 pm
Mallonee made the downpayment and paid all settlement fees and recording costs; the balance of the purchase price was obtained by mortgaging the property. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 12:33 am by Izak Lessing
The full judgment can be accessed here: Firstrand Bank ta Wesbank v McCallum (2020/5463) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1004 (7 October 2024) (saflii.org) [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 1:12 pm by Adam Levitin
The Supreme Court handed down a disastrous antitrust opinion in Ohio v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:10 am by tracey
ebookers.com Deutschland GmbH v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV: (Case C-112/11);  [2012] WLR (D)  217 “The concept of  ’optional price supplements’, referred to in the last sentence of article 23(1) of Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community, covered costs… [read post]