Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General" Results 1461 - 1480 of 14,156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2023, 12:18 pm by Suraj Vyas
We’re going to start a bit dry with definitions, but I’m an attorney…so what did you expect? [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
Congratulations to Nelson Richards of the California Attorney General's office, who represents the defendant. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Generally, “a hearing is required to determine whether discharge was for cause” ( Ulico Cas. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:42 pm by David Klein
Attorney advertising Photo by Miquel Parera on Unsplash Similar Blog Posts: First Circuit Vacates Massive TCPA Class Action Settlement Due to Conflict Florida TCPA Action Survives Motion to Dismiss Duguid v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:31 am by Yuval Shany
On Dec. 13, 2022, the Israeli Supreme Court published a 51-page judgment in Kohelet Forum v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Under the State Constitution, the Supreme Court is a court of “general original” (i.e., “unlimited”) jurisdiction, meaning it is “competent to entertain all causes of action unless its jurisdiction has been specifically proscribed” (People v Correa, 15 NY3d 213 [2010] [quotations omitted]). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:35 am by Marcia Coyle
“Specifically, the state of Texas has abused the federal courts by intentionally and repeatedly filing lawsuits against the federal government in district court divisions staffed entirely, or almost entirely, by judges appointed during presidencies of the Texas attorney general’s and governor’s party,” the brief read. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:22 am by Wilson Ang (SG) and Jeremy Lua (SG)
   Singapore Court of Appeal clarifies right to private action under the Singapore PDPA In a related development, in September 2022, the Court of Appeal in Singapore handed down a significant decision in Reed, Michael v Bellingham, Alex (Attorney-General, intervener) [2022] SGCA 60, clarifying that emotional distress can constitute “loss or damage” required to found a statutory right to private action under the Singapore PDPA. [read post]