Search for: "Roberts v. Love" Results 1461 - 1480 of 1,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2016, 9:04 am
[Today's guest post is from Robert K S, who is a patent attorney from Cleveland, Ohio.]Countering obviousness rejections can be both the most quotidian and the most challenging task of the patent practitioner or pro se applicant. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:26 am
[Today's guest post is from Robert K S, who is a patent attorney from Cleveland, Ohio.]Countering obviousness rejections can be both the most quotidian and the most challenging task of the patent practitioner or pro se applicant. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
And, if a constitutional right to marry is extended to same-sex couples, on what grounds can we exclude loving polygamous or “polyamorous” groupings of three or more? [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
  To her, the Court’s 2012 decision in Fisher v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:25 am
Kohl asked if Sotomayor believed that Roe v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm by Tobias Thienel
(Rees v United Kingdom, para 49; Sheffield and Horsham v United Kingdom, para 66; see also Cossey v United Kingdom, paras 43, 46; I v United Kingdom (GC), para 78; Jaremowicz v Poland, para 48 ('right of a man and a woman to marry'))   The historical analysis of the original intent behind Article 12 doesn't help. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm by Timothy Sandefur, guest-blogging
This claim (which I think originated in Democracy And Distrust, but was made famous by Robert Bork) is very misleading. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
For further information, see this piece sent to the IPKat from his friend Jeff Roberts. [read post]