Search for: "Russell, Appeal of"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 2,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2014, 1:37 pm
“, “Case Update: Family Island Dispute Goes to Appeal” and “Can a Kid Bring His or Her Own Support Claim? [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:57 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 5:17 pm
Servs., 616 F.3d 665, 681 (7th Cir.2010); Russell v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:33 am
Russell, in which a sharply divided Court held that the 30-day period for filing a notice of appeal from a final district court judgment was jurisdictional, despite the absence of a jurisdictional label. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 8:47 am
Russell of Norfolk, experienced criminal defense lawyers. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 1:28 pm
The federal judge presiding over the case ruled against them -- ruled that the law is so clear they could not possibly have believed that what they did was legal -- and most observers, having heard the Oral Argument on appeal, predicted that they will lose in the Court of Appeals, too. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:07 am
Thaler (No. 10-895), limited to two questions: (a) Whether there was jurisdiction to issue a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am
[Note: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, served as counsel to the respondents in the case, but the author of this post was not involved in the case.] [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:25 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in American Axle.] [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 2:37 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondent in this case. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 3:57 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:28 am
Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) non-applied regulations governing the administration of cattle and sheep grazing on the public range; 2) whether plaintiffs' facial challenge to the BLM's non-applied regulations is ripe for review; 3) whether the court of appeals holding that the BLM violated National Environmental Policy Act's requirement that the Bureau take a “hard look” at the environmental effects of the regulations in the Environmental Impact… [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:49 am
If you or someone you love feels as though they have been unfairly treated by SSA, or want to ensure that you receive a fair and detailed review of your claim, contact the Law Offices of Russell J. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 3:56 am
Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel to the respondent in this case.] [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:35 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents respondent IMS Health in the case.] [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:12 am
Interestingly, although the new right-exclusive remedy rule has been a staple of California jurisprudence for over 150 years (see, e.g., Russell v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:01 am
She appealed. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
DOL’s interpretation has appeared only in amicus curiae briefs in the courts of appeals – DOL was not a party. [read post]
