Search for: "Russell v State"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 2,847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am
United States, 14-282, is yet another gift from the St. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Jianlin Chen, Deconstructing the Religious Free Market, (3 Journal of Law, Religion and State 1-24 (2014)).Russell G. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
In a recent case called Regnier v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:49 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in State Water Contractors v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 12:35 am
“The possibilities of rolling out a local RTW [campaign] in a non-RTW state deserves a full-court press by those of us who care about free market economics and allowing communities to make the best decisions for their people,” declared Jon Russell, a baby-faced partisan of the right who was sandwiched between Andrew Kloster of the Heritage Foundation and Patrick Gleason of Americans for Tax Reform. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:10 pm
The petition of the day is: Cohen v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Premo v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
Jeremy gives the floor to Nick Briggs and Kerry Russell (Shakespeares), who report on 118 Data Resource Limited v IDS Data Services Limited and others [2014] EWHC 3629 (Ch), a High Court, England and Wales, ruling of Deputy Judge David Halpern QC, in which they represented the defendants. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 7:28 am
Gelboim v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:26 am
This week the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Elonis v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am
In re Ryan 14-375Issue: Whether this Court should issue a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition ordering the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to issue the mandate in Henry v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:17 am
Russell (1966), Keyishian v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:02 am
At ThinkProgress, Bryce Covert reports that forty-three “sexual harassment cases have been dismissed” in the wake of Vance v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 2:22 am
” [Disclosure: Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to one set of petitioners in the Alabama redistricting cases.] [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 am
Lopez-Venezuela, in which he criticized the Court’s failure to grant review of cases invalidating state statutes – such as the decisions striking down five states’ bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
