Search for: "STATE EX REL. v. Court of Appeals"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 2,056
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2011, 10:42 pm
On June 30, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part, but reversed in part, the District of New Jersey’s dismissal of the declined qui tam suit U.S. ex rel. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
” State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:30 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
Constitutional Challenge to False Marking Statute Oral arguments in the case of United States, ex rel. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
In People ex rel. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:29 am
GE Healthcare, Ltd., et. al (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: Judge Solis compares false marking to ‘someone who says, ‘I am not married,’ when indeed, they are’: United States of America, ex rel. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' supplemental briefPetitioners' reply brief CVSG Information:Invited: March 21, 2011Filed: May 27, 2011 (Deny) Title: United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:24 am
State of West Virginia ex rel. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:28 am
" Forck also noted that a negative decision in this case "would put the 8th Circuit directly at odds with the 10th Circuit's 2010 ruling in Brown ex. rel Brown v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:56 pm
General Assembly way back in 1939, an era when de jure segregation was the reality across the country.3 The politicians created the law school specifically so that aspiring black attorneys could get a “separate but equal” legal education without trying to attend a white law school.4 The only other public law school in the state, UNCCH Law, wouldn’t accept black students until forced to do so by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in a 1951 lawsuit… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm
Generally, a party “is ‘[o]ne by or against whom a lawsuit is brought,’ ” United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 2:40 pm
Fitzgerald and State ex rel. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 2:40 pm
Fitzgerald and State ex rel. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 3:29 am
On June 9, in an unpublished decision in U.S. ex rel. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 3:29 am
On June 9, in an unpublished decision in U.S. ex rel. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:16 am
The Court of Appeal had adopted that restriction as a necessary limitation on what it characterized as broad language in Wutchumma Water Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:25 pm
Alaska’s Court of Appeals is no different, as demonstrated by its recent decision in Bates v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 5:06 am
Instead of reviewing the trial judge’s decision, the 5th District decided that the trial court never had jurisdiction to act on the motion, because of the 1978 Ohio Supreme Court decision in State ex. rel Special Prosecutors v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
“The Court of Appeals in this case adopted the rationale and conclusions previously adopted by the Western Section of the Court of Appeals Lockhart v. [read post]
