Search for: "STATE v MURPHY" Results 1461 - 1480 of 2,304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2013, 8:30 am by Mack Sperling
  There's very little North Carolina state law on trademark infringement, but Judge Murphy found enough to enter a temporary restraining order against the Defendants. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 2:00 am by Peter Mahler
In Giaimo, the trial court adopted the hearing officer’s recommendation to apply a so-called “Murphy discount” — named after Murphy v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 1:53 pm
Murphy decision, with the amendment of RSSL § 607-b [L.2004, c. 725, § 1, eff. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:28 am by Rob Robinson
Potentially, a Lot of Permutations – eDiscovery Best Practices http://bit.ly/UExXjZ (Doug Austin) When It Comes to eDiscovery, Leave the Driving to Us – http://bit.ly/UyyTWW (Bob Ambrogi) Where There’s Smoke There’s Fire: Powering eDiscovery with Data Loss Prevention – http://bit.ly/XyQTqj (Allison Walton) Without Request, Delaware State Judge Orders Use of Predictive Coding in Complex Case – http://bit.ly/Xn4VLB (Robert Hilson) Why is Legal Hold Still a… [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:05 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 6:47 am by Mack Sperling
 If you dip in to Judge Murphy's Wednesday opinion in Blue Ridge Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 7:13 am by Mack Sperling
Judge Murphy mentioned all those cases, but he left out Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K… [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 5:00 am by Lisa Murphy
Mar. 1, 2012), and in New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am by Susan Brenner
  These two counts charged Laiwala with violating California Penal Code § 115(a), which provides as follows:Every person who knowingly procures or offers any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office within this state, which instrument, if genuine, might be filed, registered, or recorded under any law of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a felony.People v. [read post]