Search for: "Sees v. Sees"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 122,014
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2024, 11:08 am
Trademark Office issued the following 217 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in May 2024 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Registration Number Wordmark 7377089 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377091 MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377090 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7383748 GUIDED PATHWAYS 7383753 GAME CHANGERS 7383747 PURPOSE FIRST 7383749 MOMENTUM PATHWAYS 7378370 KATHLEEN POST 7382555… [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 10:53 am
The case known as Garland v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Plaintiff's claims against his union, Professional Staff Congress (PSC-CUNY), and its legal director, arising from their selection of an allegedly biased arbitrator are barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel based on this Court's resolution of that issue in plaintiff's prior appeals (see Matter of Dowlah v City Univ. of N.Y., 189 AD3d 533, 534 [1st Dept 2020]; Dowlah v American Arbitration Assn., 221 AD3d 426, 426 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Plaintiff's claims against his union, Professional Staff Congress (PSC-CUNY), and its legal director, arising from their selection of an allegedly biased arbitrator are barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel based on this Court's resolution of that issue in plaintiff's prior appeals (see Matter of Dowlah v City Univ. of N.Y., 189 AD3d 533, 534 [1st Dept 2020]; Dowlah v American Arbitration Assn., 221 AD3d 426, 426 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 5:26 am
In my essay after the oral argument in FDA v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 4:27 am
We’re disappointed to see that states have failed to act on any of our recommendations, including the letter we sent in February. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
The chief target of these efforts lately has been the author of the decision that overturned Roe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:56 pm
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
” The explanation for failure to consider due process in past cases was “faulty” because it did not consider the due process clause, which protects vested rights.Weimer considered a 2008 case, Burmaster v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:51 pm
See, e.g., Sierra Club v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:40 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:16 pm
See, e.g., Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm
” Acknowledging that the justices in Vidal v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:16 pm
" See People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 2:21 pm
See, e.g., Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:36 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:15 am
See Hollingsworth v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:11 am
In Thomson v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:43 am
” See, Brown Chemical Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:26 am
[1] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]