Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 6,089
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2019, 12:31 pm
These purchases are financed by the bank, rather than the bank acting as seller. [read post]
1 May 2019, 11:30 pm
As we learned in Jadebray & Noa and Nani v Clarke-Coles [2017] EWHC 1400 [on IPKat here], to encourage consistency across the site and make the sales process as easy as possible for consumers, Amazon encourages sellers to use pre-existing generic ASINs (or Amazon Standard Identification Numbers) where possible. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:37 pm
United Cannabis Corporation v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 8:26 am
Supreme Court’s landmark 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:31 am
See, e.g., Anthony v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 5:01 am
In Daniel v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:49 pm
See generally, Glidepath, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:49 pm
See generally, Glidepath, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 1:20 pm
In a recent case captioned Heritage Handoff Holdings, LLC, v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Some Food for Thought After Lee v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 12:35 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 6:25 am
Of further interest is that, in December 2013, Birss J found the UK patent valid and infringed by Tristar, the seller of a different rival garden hose (this decision was later upheld by the Court of Appeal). [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 3:15 am
(And incidentally… 2019-04-21 Computer and Internet Updates for 2019-04-21 https://t.co/UjyyN3w0XU 2019-04-22 Computer and Internet Updates for 2019-04-21 https://t.co/p1pGixVYRG 2019-04-22 What directors of Canadian organizations need to know about potential individual liability for cyber-claims https://t.co/AQgskmEEOf 2019-04-22 FCC Cracks Down on Video Streaming Boxes https://t.co/52LoWWUoXs 2019-04-22 Court refuses to order an accused to unlock cell phone R. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 1:52 pm
Adtrader, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:59 am
Supreme Court handed down its landmark 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:53 pm
Specifically, the SEC will focus on (i) compliance and risks in critical market infrastructure; (ii) retail investors, including seniors and those saving for retirement; (iii) FINRA and MSRB; (iv) cybersecurity; and (v) anti-money laundering programs. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Code, § 17500, et seq.) or the Check Sellers, Bill Payers, and Proraters Law (Fin. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 12:39 pm
” Gomez v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:32 am
The Eleventh Circuit agreed with that conclusion based on the plain language of the licensing agreement and affirmed the lower court’s decision (Kroma Makeup EU, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
As part of an increased focus on compliance, the experts noted that sellers should be prepared to discuss regulatory, compliance and related business points in detail, including: (i) the handling of ePatient data/payor data; (ii) coding compared to market; (iii) reliance on reimbursement from high margin ancillary businesses; (iv) regulatory risk and (v) relationships with payors. [read post]
