Search for: "Shields v. Shields"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 6,240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Appellate Division rules disciplinary penalty imposed on employee excessiveMatter of Gomez v Kelly, 2008 NY Slip Op 07181, Decided on October 2, 2008, Appellate Division, First DepartmentNew York City Police Commissioner Raymond W. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 12:25 pm
In Heimbuch v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:29 am
Apple argues that the failure to align the scope of the claimed invention with the scope of the features explored in the survey means that this case is on all fours with Fractus, S.A. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 9:33 am
Philadelphia workers compensation lawyers say that Pantano v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
A recent case out of the Central District of California, Milhouse v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:43 am
See Force v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:43 am
See Force v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:43 am
See Force v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 7:29 am
Abbasi and Hernandez v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 4:10 am
In Cortes v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 12:43 pm
In Franciscan Alliance, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 7:37 am
Image via WikipediaAgence France Presse reports that Iceland's parliament in June unanimously approved the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative ("IMMI")[http://www.immi.is], a freedom of information bill that the European island nation envisions will create the world's strongest shield to protect journalists and whistleblowers.WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is one of IMMI's biggest boosters. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:25 am
In the wake of the Court’s decision earlier this year in Snyder v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 11:48 pm
A recent decision of C.L.B. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:20 am
In the recent case of Espinoza v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
The Court of Appeals' decision in Michael P. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 3:38 pm
However, the court rejected Mylan’s attempt to dismiss claims that it misrepresented the “risk of errors” in its Medicaid rebate calculations while at the time of those statements it was allegedly manipulating EpiPen’s rebate eligibility (MYL Litigation Recovery I LLC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Pike v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 6:34 am
At issue in Betz v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 6:29 am
Revolution Eyewear v. [read post]