Search for: "Starks v State"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 1,778
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Nahum (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court Nevada: Online forum operator gets easy 47 USC 230 Win: Two Plus Two v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:15 pm
Other states that appear to have similar cases on point are Massachusetts (Fontaine Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
However, the paradox is not as stark as it first appears. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:55 pm
Winn, et al. (09-987) and Garriott v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:38 pm
Two years ago, when a splintered Supreme Court approved lethal injection as a means of execution in Baze v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:54 pm
The new case — Staub v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:06 am
People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:33 am
Writing for AOL Politics Daily, Andrew Cohen predicts that the Court is likely to rule in favor of former Attorney General John Ashcroft in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, explaining that he doesn’t “think the Court would have accepted the review if it wanted to endorse the 9th Circuit’s view and allow former executive branch officials to face trial — even in the stark circumstances presented by al-Kidd and his lawyers. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
Carhart and its predecessor Ayotte v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am
One of those cases, Smith v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:47 pm
The Supreme Court Costs Office Guide 2006 states at 1.2(d): “At present independent cost [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 3:04 pm
Stark v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:19 pm
This October 2010 New Jersey Trial Result Is In Stark Contrast To $3.2 Million Verdict In 2009 Montana Zometa Case (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) In early October 2010 the New Jersey state court jury which heard the evidence in the case of Bessemer v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:47 am
Supreme Court's decision this year limiting the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:42 am
In FM Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:33 am
Naturally, the situation’s not as stark as so far presented. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 11:17 am
The NYCRR primarily contains state agency rules and regulations adopted under the State Administrative Procedure Act (SAPA). [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm
Nocera doesn’t note that the statute driving this policy dates to at least 1872 and California is unusual among states in its hostility to the clauses. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The answer is complex, simply because it depends on: the actual compensation arrangement being proposed the application of federal law (including Stark and anti kickback rules) to the extent it applies and state law governing self-referral, fee-splitting, kickbacks, and patient brokering Federal law contains numerous exceptions to Stark and "safe harbors" under anti-kickback law. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 9:26 pm
Section 238-a of NYS Public Health Law is sometimes referred to as “mini-Stark” as it somewhat parallels the federal law by the same name. [read post]
