Search for: "State v Edge" Results 1461 - 1480 of 2,592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2011, 12:22 pm by John Richards
Over a year after emerging from the worst recession in a generation, the United States economy continues to be sluggish, and teeters on the edge of falling into another recession. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Mexico (Inter-American Court) and (Jessica Lenahan) Gonzales v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5684; farewell Gates v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and State Consumer Privacy Laws In re. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
  Antebellum Case Law on the Right to Arms Under State and Federal ConstitutionsA right to carry weapons openly for self-defenseNunn v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Prone to certification even after Wal-Mart v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:20 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Apple, Inc., GPNE alleged Apple infringed patents that it claimed were essential to the GPRS, EDGE, and/or LTE cellular standards. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:05 am by Frank Cranmer
” This general principle and Edge’s “fundamental state value” were considered in the case of Redmond-Bate v Director Of Public Prosecutions [1999] EWHC Admin 733, in which three Christian fundamentalists successfully appealed against a decision of conviction under s.89(2) Police Act 1996 and the evaluation of an imminent breach of the peace was considered. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:12 am by Christopher Danzig
Yesterday, the Supreme Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:34 am by Mark Zamora
An estimated 15,000 premature infants born each year in the United States are affected by some degree of ROP. [read post]
30 May 2011, 10:22 am by nyinjuries
” Saretsky v. 85 Kenmare Realty Corp., 2011 WL 1796367 (May 12, 2011). [read post]