Search for: "State v Ray"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 1,938
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2010, 7:41 pm
” In Joshua Wayne Andrews v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 11:17 am
The NYCRR primarily contains state agency rules and regulations adopted under the State Administrative Procedure Act (SAPA). [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 8:20 am
According to its website, there are nearly 1,500 IHOP restaurants located in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 5:42 am
While it is atypical for courts to find state action in a reactionary (as opposed to a "sting") shoplifting case, the Court of a Appeals, New York's highest court, found in People v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 5th District.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Mandatory minimum -- Armed Career Criminal Act -- Predicate convictions -- Prior felony possession of short-barreled shotgun was not violent felony under ACCA -- District court properly declined to sentence defendant under ACCAUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:39 pm
” Ex parte Jamie Ray Mills, 2010 Ala. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:41 pm
On July 27th the USPTO set up more stringent rules for the issuance of BMPs in their Interim Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility for Process Claims in View of Bilski v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The court in Katz relied on Bell v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 9:26 pm
(b) A health care provider or a referring practitioner may not present or cause to be presented to any individual or third party payor or other entity a claim, bill, or other demand for payment for clinical laboratory services, pharmacy services, radiation therapy services, physical therapy services or x-ray or imaging services furnished pursuant to a referral prohibited by this subdivision. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 8:51 am
On July 27th the USPTO set up more stringent rules for the issuance of BMPs in their Interim Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility for Process Claims in View of Bilski v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 12:57 pm
Now available on SSRN are several contributions to the Penn State Law Review's symposium on Ashcroft v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 9:37 am
Steve speaks and writes extensively on McCormick v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
I would be remiss for not noting that the Sixth Circuit has released an unusually large number of opinions in the last week, all denying relief: Donald Ray Middlebrooks v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:17 am
Lawyers should blow up x-rays so skeptical jurors can see them with their own eyes. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 11:50 am
" The claim that the 7 ½-foot tall high-power microwave device — dubbed the "Pain Ray" by the media — will cause no injury is highly dubious, to say the least: There is good evidence from the United States military that it is capable of inflicting not only intolerable pain, but death. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 6:00 pm
Nafal v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:23 am
DeSena v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 9:35 am
See Ray v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 pm
Petitioner of the Cassation Challenge in the Case of Sara Grant Tobal, Josefina Escalante Romero et al. v. [read post]
