Search for: "State v. B. V."
Results 1461 - 1480
of 41,746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2023, 4:25 am
In Nimkoff v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6[e][2]). [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 11:12 am
These stated variously a. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
Mark B. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
United States, Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 1:13 pm
The new case, Genesis B. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
CAAF held in 2023 in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:15 am
In doing so, he decried the fact that the Court of Chancery is increasingly asked to decide disputes involving non-compete agreements under the laws of other states, including California. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
In 2017, NYDFS was one of the first state financial regulators to impose cybersecurity requirements on covered entities. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 am
See Section 191-d (7)(b)(i) and (v). [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:09 am
One of the hallmarks of Chair Khan’s tenure has been the FTC’s centralization of authority throughout the administrative state, acting as a vehicle for policy through the FTC’s ostensibly broad authority. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
" Accordingly, the Commissioner dismissed Petitioner's appeal and denied Petitioner's application.* §277.1(b) sets out the specific notice required for removal applications pursuant to Education Law §306, which is distinct from the notice required under §275.11(a) for appeals pursuant to Education Law §310. ** See Matter of Lloyd v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
" Accordingly, the Commissioner dismissed Petitioner's appeal and denied Petitioner's application.* §277.1(b) sets out the specific notice required for removal applications pursuant to Education Law §306, which is distinct from the notice required under §275.11(a) for appeals pursuant to Education Law §310. ** See Matter of Lloyd v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
To test this, we classify U.S. states based on the percentage of voters who voted for the Republican or Democrat candidate in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 2:09 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:08 pm
As to the issue of invalidation by anticipation by Moriarty, the Federal Circuit stated that “a product-by-process claim is a product claim. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:05 pm
From Thursday's decision by Judge Randolph Moss (D.D.C.) in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Supreme Court observed that the Automatic Orders are codified within DRL § 236(B)(2)(b). [read post]
