Search for: "State v. Hennings" Results 1461 - 1480 of 1,585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
"Harley Lewin (McCarter & English) for Louboutin stated that they considered the decision to be "a significant win, not only for Louboutin, but for the fashion industry in general". [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:03 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court stated: [W]hen conduct is prohibited by statute, the attorney-immunity defense is neither categorically inapplicable nor automatically available, even if the defense might otherwise cover the conduct at issue. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:43 am
We might learn more about the Court of Appeal's views on this from Pfizer v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:54 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit issued an opinion in August that illustrates the need for doing this. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:03 am by Andrew Trask
As the Subcommittee Report describes the current state of issue certification:  Rule 23(c)(4) says that “[w]hen appropriate, an action may be brought or maintained as a class action with respect to particular issues. [read post]