Search for: "State v. Hennings"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 1,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
We also await the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:52 am
State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 10:37 am
Coral Ridge Ministries Media, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 3:57 am
In Meinecke v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm
” (Quoting Busick v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:39 am
Hoggard v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
"Harley Lewin (McCarter & English) for Louboutin stated that they considered the decision to be "a significant win, not only for Louboutin, but for the fashion industry in general". [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:03 am
The Court stated: [W]hen conduct is prohibited by statute, the attorney-immunity defense is neither categorically inapplicable nor automatically available, even if the defense might otherwise cover the conduct at issue. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:43 am
We might learn more about the Court of Appeal's views on this from Pfizer v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
—William Shakespeare 1Cole v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
Henning, Peter J. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:54 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit issued an opinion in August that illustrates the need for doing this. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:03 am
As the Subcommittee Report describes the current state of issue certification: Rule 23(c)(4) says that “[w]hen appropriate, an action may be brought or maintained as a class action with respect to particular issues. [read post]
12 May 2016, 11:05 am
In so holding, the Court reaffirmed its holding in Corwin v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 2:49 pm
"] From Joseph v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
Henning, Peter J. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 1:25 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Omnicare Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 8:41 am
In Farley v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:38 am
See Everson v. [read post]