Search for: "State v. Hunt" Results 1461 - 1480 of 1,924
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2007, 8:31 pm
  The resentment state judges felt at the then-recent federal takeover can still be heard:The exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence cannot be interposed solely to provide a tidy "fox hunting" theory of criminal justice. ...We agree with the District of Columbia Court of Appeals when it stated that it cannot believe that the "Supreme Court has forbidden the police to investigate crime. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Michigan State University in 1968 and his Masters degree from Michigan State University in 1971. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
What will America become if, as reported, the five most conservative members of the US Supreme Court angrily and emphatically overrule Roe v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
United States On 15 March 2023, the Colorado Attorney General’s Office finalised the rules implementing the Colorado Privacy Act. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Based on the quoted language, however, it appears to be the 2001 holding in Ohio v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:14 am by Elie Mystal
Which by the way, you need to lay the ground work for the litigation by mailing the office a letter stating you are concerned for your health and safety as a result of the bed bugs so that when you are the one that gets an infection, you have a “leg” to stand on in court as you had already informed them that your health and safety was in jeopardy! [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 11:37 am by Rishabh Bhandari, David Hopen
Kemal Kilicdaroglu, leader of the opposition Republican People’s Party, criticized the government’s “witch hunt” as “a shadow on the struggle that is being led for democracy. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 12:59 pm by Jessica Smith
Some of the activity appears to be covered by existing state statutory crimes. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:58 pm by Melina Padron
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v Hassan Abdi and Afrah Khalaf [2010] EWHC 3083 (Admin) The Court of Appeal decided that time spent appealing against deportation counts in assessing whether an individual has been detained for an unreasonably long period. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:50 am by Mark Zamora
Other states' rulings and opinions:Zimmerman v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:33 am by Susan Hennessey
Tuesday, Ben bemoaned the state of drone-themed humor in the New York Times, and followed it up yesterday morning with a tale of national security parody gone awry. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]