Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2022, 8:08 am
If a state decides football games on Sundays violates the Lord's day of rest, then there goes your Atlanta Falcons/Texans/Colts parlay. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:11 am
Article 13 The domestic proceedings in this case culminated in the judgment given by the House of Lords in JD v East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust and Ors [2005] 2 AC 373. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:00 am
The judgment appelaed is [2018] EWCA Civ 2026 and will be heard at 10:30am in Courtroom Two by Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Kitchin, and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
The judgment in this still has not been released. 14 July | Law Review: Lord Judge LCJ on the State of The Nation – an important speech: Charon QC summarises Lord Judge’s speech. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:37 am
The principle, sometimes called the rule on maintenance of capital, was authoritatively stated by the House of Lords in Trevor v Whitworth, and has been subsequently applied both by the courts and in statutory provisions. [read post]
Case Law: Raab MP v Associated – confidentiality agreements and libel proceedings – Gervase de Wilde
23 Dec 2011, 12:57 am
The Defendant also sought to rely on the principle that no impediment should be placed in the way of witnesses willing to give evidence, citing Lord Judge CJ in HM Attorney-General v MGN Ltd [2011] EWHC 2074. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:59 pm
In Texas, both federal and state laws exist to protect people like Hephzibal Olivia Lord from being overwhelmed and mistreated by police during criminal investigations. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
That case also involved the House of Lords rejecting the former fundamental breach doctrine and firmly stating that the question is one of construction, not merely of the exclusion clause alone, but of the whole contract. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
On 27 June 2023 the House of Lords approved an amendment to the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill which aims to tackle “strategic litigation against public participation” (“SLAPPs”); the use of defamation law to silence critics. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:09 am
On 2 April, a nursing entry stated ‘Nil further chest pain’. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:31 am
Lord Eassie went on to state at para. 48 of the Court’s judgment: “. . . we for our part do not see any reason why in ordinary, contemporary English usage ‘leave’ in this context should not simply connote a period in which the employee is free from work commitment. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
This was a matter which had divided the House of Lords, and consequently been left open, in R v G (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2008] UKHL 37, in which a decision to prosecute a 15 year old for sexual intercourse with a 12 year old was challenged. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
According to media reports this time last week, a case similar to Carey may very well be brewing: Sinn Féin TD takes breach of privacy action against Mediahuis and state (Barry Whyte, Business Post, 24 September 2023) Martin Kenny also suing the gardaí and the state over a series of articles published last year which did not name him. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 8:35 am
It reads like this: I AM the LORD thy God. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:06 am
Lord Justice Hooper adopted Mr Justice Baker’s reasoning as to why this was a special case. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 1:30 am
Quoting from both Lord Arbinger v Ashton [(1873) LR Eq 358 at 374] and Schneider NO and Others v AA and Another [2010 (5) SA 203 (WCC) at 211], the court re-iterated the position that, whilst there is no doubt some natural leaning on the part of an expert towards their paymasters, this does not in any way absolve the expert of the duty of impartiality and integrity. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:37 am
”However, it should be noted Lord McCluskey’s initial report clearly states : “We do not suggest that the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court should be ended. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:09 am
Lord Toulson would have dismissed the police’s appeal, stating that he did not think that the evidence given by the police explains why they need to retain the information for many years after the event about someone about whom they have concluded that he was not known to act violently. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
In the case of U.S. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:35 am
Tugendhat J referred to the guidance given by Lord Woolf on the subject in Hodgson v Imperial Tobacco [1998] EWCA Civ 224 which led to Queen’s Bench Division judges giving formal judgments setting out their reasons for decisions on interim applications. [read post]
