Search for: "State v. Lyles" Results 1461 - 1480 of 1,491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
Lyle & Scott v American Eagle Outfitters, Inc [2021] EWHC 90 (January 2021) This case is a breach of contract and passing off claim concerning the two eagle logos depicted below. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:25 am by Lyle Denniston
  His vote and his opinions created a revolution for gay rights, helped save Roe v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 3:07 am by Lyle Denniston
   They lost in the Supreme Court in a 5-to-4 decision in 1973 (Gilligan v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 3:18 am
  Lyle Roberts notes on his 10b-5 Daily blog (here), that on September 24, 2008, the Southern District of New York refused to remand the Harborview Mortgage case (which I previously discussed here) back to state court. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 10:20 am by Deborah Pearlstein
Probably most striking is that in its rush to urge the Court's engagement in the case, the dissent opens by invoking Marbury v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 11:54 am by Deborah Pearlstein
Probably most striking is that in its rush to urge the Court’s engagement in the case, the dissent opens by invoking Marbury v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:06 am by Lyle Denniston
   The same thing happened with the abortion rights case, Roe v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 11:18 am by Steve Vladeck
Especially given the precedent for emergency, end-of-term arguments and decisions that Lyle Denniston reminded everyone about, not seeking similar treatment seemed, at the time, a perplexing move on the government’s part. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am by George M. Wallace
"); Lyle Denniston ("Argument recap: Moving on to the mandate (FINAL UPDATE)"); and Tom Goldstein ("A tale of two great arguments"). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am by George M. Wallace
"); Lyle Denniston ("Argument recap: Moving on to the mandate (FINAL UPDATE)"); and Tom Goldstein ("A tale of two great arguments"). [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 5:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
” This rule was developed and applied by the Second Circuit in its 2022 decision in Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd. v. [read post]