Search for: "State v. Mart"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 1,845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2010, 6:15 pm
Then, both sides can ask questions and take turns dismissing jurors using what are called peremptory strikes (the number of strikes varies by state, but it is often enough for one side to eliminate all qualified minorities).In a 1986 case, Batson v. [read post]
9 May 2015, 12:22 pm
K-Mart Corp. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm
In McReynolds, which was decided after the Court’s ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:28 am
In Griffin v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:46 am
., et al. v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 12:52 pm
Another 1992 premises liability ruling by the Indiana Supreme Court, Wal Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 12:52 pm
Another 1992 premises liability ruling by the Indiana Supreme Court, Wal Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:26 am
That decision, issued by Judge Leonard Sand, held that because the named plaintiffs were not current employees, the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
The cease and desist order can enjoin defendants from certain activities within the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 8:12 am
While the Supreme Court stated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:45 am
v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) US General – Decisions California state appeals court upholds Bank of America win in trade secret spat with K C Multimedia (Law360) US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Canon USA – Canon sues former employee for revealing trade secrets to rival Ikon Office Solutions in violation of confidentiality agreement (Law360) US Patent Reform Patent Reform Act of 2009 introduced in Senate and House… [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:34 pm
As the Court stated in R. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 2:32 am
White v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:47 am
In its ruling, the Court of Appeals confirmed that, because Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 42 was “patterned after Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, federal decisions and authorities interpreting current federal class action requirements are instructive,” including Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 9:03 pm
" Carrozza v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:58 am
Wal-Mart, 603 F.3d 571 (9th Cir. 2010), which the largest companies in America have asked the Supreme Court to reverse — these claims are tough to win, even tougher to make a living doing, moreso since Ashcroft v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:03 pm
This essay is adapted from his foreword to Eugene Volokh, Sebelius v. [read post]
