Search for: "State v. May"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 120,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am
The decision in Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) clarifies the application of the statutory defence of honest opinion under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
United States 21-877Issue: Whether a district court may consider the 2018 amendment to the sentences mandated by 18 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:06 am
Busk v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:00 pm
See Kocsis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 8:06 am
In Smith v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 10:55 am
States like California have a great deal on the line in Janus v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:16 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:34 am
(Sindell v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 10:46 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:21 am
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 3:12 pm
As Paul acknowledges "even though comparative constitutionalism may provide greater contrasts and interesting data, surely we get some value from comparative state constitutionalism, especially in these days of same sex marriage litigation. [read post]
15 May 2018, 9:14 am
On May 14, 2018 the Supreme Court of the United States released its decision in Murphy v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 9:14 am
On May 14, 2018 the Supreme Court of the United States released its decision in Murphy v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:20 am
McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-434/09); [2011] WLR (D) 153 “Parliament and Council Directive 2004/38/EC was not applicable to a European Union citizen who had never exercised their right of free movement, who had always resided in a member state of which they were a national and who was also a national of another member state. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 1:37 pm
In Dion Johnson v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Court of Appeals fo the 11th Circuit’s rule that reasonable jurists could not debate an issue foreclosed by binding circuit precedent, even when a judge on the panel issued the binding precedent and subsequently stated that the panel’s decision may be erroneous, misapplies the standard articulated by the Supreme Court in Miller-El v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:28 pm
In INS v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
Polmear and another v Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, heard 15th May 2023. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
For judgment, please download: [2019] UKSC 2 For Court’s Press Summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII To watch the hearing, please visit: Supreme Court Website (8 May 2018 morning session) (8 May 2018 afternoon session) (9 May 2018 morning session) (9 May 2018 afternoon session) [read post]
