Search for: "State v. McDonald"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 1,776
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2010, 8:09 am
Florida and United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
Nike went after one end user for ordering Chinese counterfeit trainers via the Internet: EWPCC summary judgement in Nike v E Bateman (IP Dragon) Crosstown Music bitten by partial assignment of copyright: EWCA decision in Crosstown v Rive Droite & Ors (IP Whiteboard) Possibility of obtaining summary judgment in patent cases: Patents Court decision in Virgin Atlantic v Delta (Kluwer Patent Blog) Keeping down the price of copyright justice (1709 Blog) United… [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
McDonald, UNSECURED CLAIMS FOR CONTRACT-BASED ATTORNEY'S FEES: FOBIAN IS DEAD, BUT DOES JUSTICE HOLMES' DECISION IN RANDOLPH & RANDOLPH v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
J., and McDonald, J., concurring.) [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
The Coordinator met with Title V, Medicaid, the DD Council, ICC, state legislators and Iowa's congressional delegation, as well as representing our children with other parent, disability and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:54 pm
McDonald J confirmed that given the gravity of the issue in dispute, it [was] not appropriate for the local authority simply to … consent to immunisation pursuant to the provisions of s 33(3) of the Children Act 1989 on the basis of its shared parental responsibility for SL under the interim care order (see A Local Authority v SB, AB & MB) [2010] 2 FLR 1203 and Re Jake (Withholding Medical Treatment) [2015] EWHC 2442 (Fam)). [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:52 am
Hodges to the protection of individual gun rights in McDonald v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:25 am
McDonald’s. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
Young v. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 6:24 pm
" But even then, the court concedes that the state laws of that period (for the states that had any such laws) only regulated sale of concealable weapons, not rifles or shotguns. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:35 am
Morse v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:29 pm
I’m also assuming, simply because they claimed it in the complaint they filed (h/t to Above the Law for this entry on the lawsuit), that the named plaintiffs in McDonald v. [read post]
9 Feb 2025, 7:31 pm
On January 30, the Fifth Circuit decided Reese v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:17 pm
Lawrence v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm
Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Asssoc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm
If our commercial speech doctrine doesn’t soon start recognizing this, the regulatory state will be in trouble. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 11:43 am
(That absence was made even more apparent by the presence in the audience of Justice Clarence Thomas, who in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 7:25 am
The most famous example of this strategy is used by McDonalds, which has successfully argued that any other company that attached "Mc" to their product, like a McPhone, is creating consumer confusion that the McPhone is a McDonald's product. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
