Search for: "State v. Sales"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 20,854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2010, 12:18 pm
Toyota evidently hoped that the district court would not notice the careful parsing of its language, and that the Tabaris (who are defending this case pro se) would not call it to the court’s attention.Toyota is playing the same game on appeal: It states that bifurcation was proper because '[t]here was no factual overlap between Toyota’s trademark claims and Fast Imports’ interference claims.' But Toyota is only telling half the story by talking about only half… [read post]
24 May 2011, 2:28 pm
In Stoloff v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 7:42 am
Theatre District Realty Corp. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 3:22 am
The amended complaint stated that Ingrao sent the buyer's attorney a letter "purporting to terminate" the contract of sale and returning the deposit. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 3:27 am
A second, July, contract was for the sale and purchase of 150,000 mt of sulphur at $895 per ton. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:08 am
It remanded back to the district court to consider the infringement claim under the proper standard (Underwood v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 11:39 am
In determining the commercial reasonableness of the sale, the Court referred to its prior decision in Walker v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 5:15 pm
Sales Test Under Revenue & Taxation Code section 23101(b)(2), if a taxpayer has sales in California for the applicable tax year that exceed the lesser of $500,000 or 25% of the taxpayer’s total sales, the taxpayer is deemed to be “doing business” in California. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
SHIREY V. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Cardinale v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 6:15 am
"Here, the Board found, "the sale of two ADD A ZERO caps at a minimal cost within the state of Illinois to Ms. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 5:52 pm
Patrick Yeatts held today (in Elhert v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:25 am
Those covenants incidental to the sale of a business are subject to a common law rule of reason, while those tied to employment are governed by a stricter standard of scrutiny requiring the courts to examine certain other factors (which vary state-by-state).But not all employment-related covenants merit strict scrutiny. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:04 am
These “sale and rent back” schemes operated during a period when sale and rent back transactions were common yet unregulated. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm
Merchandise containing McCall's designs were offered for sale on... [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 11:41 am
” In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
(b) as a result of the absence of such information, the offer for sale or sale of the unboxed products constitutes a criminal offence according to the law of the Member State of the Community in which they are offered for sale or sold by third parties? [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 5:07 am
Perkins v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 12:40 pm
In Arsali v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:27 am
The trial court properly granted Wanda's motion for summary judgment.In State of Indiana v. [read post]
